What's with the 111 days obsession? I keep seeing that and it's not in the crumbs anywhere…
twatter timestamp:
>if you are logged in = your local tz
>if you are not logged in = PST
deltas
time difference between Q post & POTUS tweet
So is that your answer to my question about 111 days?
veterans today
your newswire
what does it mean (sorcha faal aka David = Mossad)
ben fulford
hal turner
true news
Anons, do some quick checking before posting BS from those sites here. Do a little due diligence. Some of these are outright disinfo, some mix good in with bad to mislead, some are just batshit crazy, some are comp'd. This is not about "subjective" judgement - you may personally "like" the individual, they may be very nice, but objectively we can't use info from these places for obvious reasons.
>Anons worked out, using the clock clues i think, that drops from 111 days ago were lining up with what is happening now.
>anons figured out the clock went back 111 days. Which fits in perfectly with the 1111 theme.
Thanks for responding, but that doesn't explain what 111 days has to do with anything. Q didn't mention 111 days, and "anons figured" is a little vague. I'm not calling anyone liars, I just don't see any sense in it, there is no actual correlation that I can see.
What is the 1111 theme?
Disclaimer: like others, I cannot be present 24/7, things happen overnight, which may be activity for others awake in different timezones, so necessarily anons, even dedicated ones, will miss things.
There was a lot of information missing, which is what I was asking for help understanding. Friendly fire doesn't help us.
Nov 11 military parade, yes I get that.
111 days for everything though?
>111 between tweets, statements, appointments, etc.
That is what I am not understanding. Did Q ask us to do that? I'm asking a logical question and asking for explanation from anons who think there is something to it and are going through this effort. If I don't understand it and someone else does, how else am I supposed to understand than by asking and someone explaining it?
Again, friendly fire is not helpful.
No, it's not a slide. I do the spreadsheet.
I really don't understand how the conclusion of 111 days came about and I'm asking for someone to help me understand it. So far the only responses have been not helpful.
>111 days was discovered by the Anons as part of the communications
Can you please explain to me HOW? That's what I am not understanding. I'm not saying it's wrong. I just don't understand how that conclusion was arrived at.
Ok, that's helpful in getting there. Do we know what the POTUS tweet was?
Again, I'm not trying to be a dick or dense, I am trying to understand. I can't put stuff in the spreadsheet about this if I have no idea what people are talking about. Understand where I'm coming from?
> 111day offset theory breakthrough Trump retweeted a rather unknown account that had posted the very red election map, and he said 'beautiful map'
Okay that is helpful! Thank you, I appreciate it.
>I think that autist Delta Anon (?) was at the center of figuring it out a couple months back.
Thank you. But if that's the one I am thinking of, he was trying to use deltas before & after POTUS tweets, looking at anon posts (i.e., 5 min before & after POTUS tweet, look at anon posts = must be crumbs!). I didn't agree with that because Q never said or implied that was the way deltas work, and was in fact opposite of what Q said.
BUT - you may be talking about something totally different. Thank you, I do appreciate the response.
No problem, but thank you. Actually I brought it up now because it's pretty slow :) Meatspace stuff was really demanding my attention at that time (Murphy's Law) so there was obviously stuff that I missed.
hehe ty, and I even responded to meself. Need moar cofveve.
Thank you - I do get that part but I couldn't figure out how that was arrived at. Some anons said it was correlated to a POTUS tweet/rt (with an election map of the US), another said DeltaAnon. See my confusion?
Again, not trying to be a dick just really trying to figure this out.
I appreciate it.
> it sounds like this Q post is telling us of foreign troops boots on the ground on US homeland soil - war here.
No, I doubt that highly.
>WAR [@]
does not signal hot physical war, more like cyber war, & war of public opinion/hearts & minds
GREAT AWAKENING
> It was Rahm Emmanuel that bailed them out of Paki jail.
Did not know that - do you have sauce? I would love to have that on file!
Hence the statement of those listed, some mix good info in with asinine BS…
Okay, thank you for clarifying. Very helpful.
>Marines taking over control at Langley last year.
ONE woman on YT said that, then a bunch of faggots with circular citations repeated it. There is no evidence that that particular event actually transpired.
Which doesn't mean that Pompeo didn't clean house (not mutually exclusive)
Thank you, I've seen a few, was just trying to get back to the beginning of when it was proposed. Appreciate it though
Okie dokie. Did you read the article that was the 2nd link?