Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 10:56 a.m. No.12721695   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1748

For an entity to become a corporation under federal law, there must be an Act of Congress creating that corporation.

http://supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm

 

Is the United States of America a Corporation?

http://factmyth.com/factoids/the-united-states-is-a-corporation/

 

Is the United States a for-profit corporation?

https://pseudolaw.com/is-united-states-for-profit-corporation

 

The United States is a Corporation: MYTH

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3927775/posts

 

Corp. U.S. Mythology

http://www.teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm

 

Internet Myths, Lies and Misinformation

https://internettheories.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-inc.html

Federal Corporations

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30365.pdf

District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=002/llsl002.db&recNum=140

District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=016/llsl016.db&recNum=0454

 

The 40 Most Enduring Myths in American History

Busting some common grade school myths we still think are true.

https://bestlifeonline.com/americas-biggest-lies/

 

Something that needs fixed:

โ€˜Corporations Are Peopleโ€™ Is Built on an Incredible 19th-Century Lie

How a farcical series of events in the 1880s produced an enduring and controversial legal precedent

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/03/corporations-people-adam-winkler/554852/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11 a.m. No.12721717   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1861

>>12721283 (lb)

Jung compared archetypes to instincts. He said that the archetype was the instinct's perception of itself, or the "self-portrait" of the instinct i.e. if the instinct was the "physical" side of the coin then the archetype was the complementary mental flip side i.e. how we subjectively, mentally experience our physical, instinctual response. The term psychoid-gene or psycho-gene would be preferable to "archetype" since this terminology provides a much clearer idea that it's the mental aspect of genes that is being discussed. An indeterminate amount of our mental life is unconscious rather than conscious.

 

The fact that mental activity is taking place does not imply that we are aware of it. Usually, we're not. Our consciousness reflects a tiny amount of the mental aspect of our existence. Jung said that the archetypes existed within the "collective unconscious". This latter phrase is misleading because it seems to suggest that the whole of the human race shares a single, common unconscious whereas it actually means that just as all human beings share a common biological ancestry, so they share a common mental ancestry too. This common mental aspect is always unconscious until it is brought into consciousness, and when that happens the particular details are unique to each of us, reflecting our unique natures, experiences and environments, although the "big picture" will be the same for all normal human beings.

 

Jung said that the archetypes reveal themselves as images. If and when they enter our consciousness, they do so in the way familiar from our dreams i.e. as images of symbols, objects and people. Since dreams, according to Freud and Jung, are the "royal road to the unconscious", they will be a primary arena for the appearance of the archetypes when they seek to make themselves known to our consciousness. (Jung said that the archetypes are teleological; they are actively seeking to express themselves.) It's important to emphasize that the archetypes are controlling our mental life whether or not they become conscious. If they do become conscious then it is in image-form, Jung maintained. An example that's normally given is that every culture has a conception of a Wise Old Man. Figures like Merlin and Gandalf are classic examples of the type. (Note that an image of an archetype is called an archetypal image; the image is not the archetype itself, rather how our consciousness interprets it. The archetype, in Kantian language, is the thing-in-itself while the archetypal image is its phenomenal representation.)

 

Jung himself claimed to have his own personal wise old man - his spirit guide called Philemon.

"Philemon represented a force which was not myself. In my fantasies I held conversations with him, and he said things which I had not consciously thought. For I observed clearly that it was he who spoke, not I. He said I treated thoughts as if I generated them myself, but in his view thoughts were like animals in the forest, or people in a room, or birds in the air, and added, 'If you should see people in a room, you would not think that you had made those people, or that you were responsible for them.' It was he who taught me psychic objectivity, the reality of the psycheโ€ฆAt times he seemed to me quite real, as if he were a living personality. I went up and down the garden with him, and to me he was what the Indians call a guru."

 

Many people have similar experiences but don't talk about them for fear of being thought mad. Jung himself was judged by some to be suffering from mental illness.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11:01 a.m. No.12721727   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12721596 (PB)

No, he's not. He's the Space Command enlisted leader. US Space Command =/= Space Force.

US Space Command is a combatant command that is comprised of any of the uniformed services

at any given time. As evidenced by a marine's position.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11:16 a.m. No.12721861   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1920 >>2325

>>12721717

If complex behaviors of survival value are somehow mentally encoded in genes, what else might be encoded? Perhaps we have genetic material that seems to serve no biological function at all, yet the reason its present in our DNA is that it's providing archetypal data, perhaps of a very sophisticated kind. Imagine that great mathematical, scientific and engineering instructions are embedded in our DNA - "unconscious" instructions, but accessible in the right circumstances. Imagine that mysterious ancient feats of engineering such as Stonehenge and the Pyramids were constructed according to such knowledge.

 

Perhaps all the great secrets of human history are encoded in our DNA. Perhaps the most profound religious knowledge is stored there.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11:39 a.m. No.12722068   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2086

>>12721748

>sounds like horse shit.

Try reading more than the headlineโ€ฆ.is that so difficult for you millennial?

 

For an entity to become a corporation under federal law,

 

there must be an Act of Congress creating that corporation.

 

 

There are no Acts of Congress expressly incorporating

 

either the "United States" or the "United States of America".

 

 

In 1871 Congress did expressly incorporate the District

 

of Columbia, but D.C. and the "United States" are not

 

one and the same. In that Act of 1871, Congress also

 

expressly extended the U.S. Constitution into D.C.:

 

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871

 

 

In United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941),

 

the Supreme Court wrote:

 

 

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/312/600.html

 

 

"We may say in passing that the argument that the

 

United States may be treated as a corporation

 

organized under its own laws, that is, under the

 

Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained

 

as not to merit serious consideration ."

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11:54 a.m. No.12722211   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2223 >>2247 >>2381

NOTABLE

 

First 9 Biden EO's now posted on Federal Registrar

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/search?conditions%5Bpublication_date%5D%5Bis%5D=2021-01-26&conditions%5Btype%5D%5B%5D=PRESDOCU

 

ALL PUBLISHED TODAY 01/26/2021 2:16 PM EST

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 11:56 a.m. No.12722223   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2247 >>2320 >>2349 >>2381

>>12722211

 

NOTABLE

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01866/modernizing-regulatory-review

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01865/a-sustainable-public-health-supply-chain

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01864/supporting-the-reopening-and-continuing-operation-of-schools-and-early-childhood-education-providers

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01863/protecting-worker-health-and-safety

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01859/promoting-covid-19-safety-in-domestic-and-international-travel

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01858/improving-and-expanding-access-to-care-and-treatments-for-covid-19

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01854/establishing-the-covid-19-pandemic-testing-board-and-ensuring-a-sustainable-public-health-workforce

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01852/ensuring-an-equitable-pandemic-response-and-recovery

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/26/2021-01849/ensuring-a-data-driven-response-to-covid-19-and-future-high-consequence-public-health-threats

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 26, 2021, 12:20 p.m. No.12722506   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12722406

There is truth. Graduating Ranger School entitles one to wear the Ranger Tab, indicating that they are Ranger Qualified.

 

Being assigned to Ranger Regiment and wearing the associated Ranger scroll aligning with battalion or regimental HQ is slightly different. Those individuals have all gone through a separate assessment and selection program prior to being assigned. Those in leadership positions have all gone through Ranger. One will not remain in the regiment long without having graduated Ranger School. Most Ranger School graduates do not serve in the Ranger Regiment.