Anonymous ID: 1ac2d1 Jan. 26, 2021, 12:51 p.m. No.12722856   🗄️.is 🔗kun

While searching for sauce on O Savins paid-for March inauguration claim, I came across this vvv .

As a native-born, life-long Texan, I bow my head in shame that I was not aware that Texas retained her Constitution. So..will all of Tx annex the rest of the US? The United States of Texas (jk)

 

WILL THE WAGES OF DEMOCRAT SIN SPELL THE END OF AMERICA?

 

“Don’t mess with Texas,” became a saying over time for a reason—everyone who’s tried it to date has fared poorly.

 

Sure, a ragtag band of roughly 200 Americans were killed, to the man, by the overwhelming forces of Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna (estimated to be as many as 6,000 soldiers), but it took 13 days and the only survivors I know of were a woman (Susannah Dickinson) and her infant daughter, Angelina, who were allowed to live as a message.

 

But that ‘message’ fell on deaf ears and became a rallying cry instead—much the same as Biden’s call for ‘unity’ on January 20th after stealing the election from 80 million Americans via proven fraud is sitting poorly with the victims.

 

At the Alamo, Americans killed an estimated 8:1 Mexicans and used this battle as pretext for declaring Texas an independent nation shortly thereafter.

 

From those ashes and bleached bones in February of 1836 rose The Republic of Texas—a sovereign nation—separate and apart from The United States, whose Constitution was ratified March 17th that same year.

 

The Republic of Texas joined the United States in 1845, but retains its Constitution—including that nation’s Declaration of Rights.

 

Representative Biedermann and his fellow patriots are reminding the legislature of that fact now:

 

>ALL POLITICAL POWER IS INHERENT IN THE PEOPLE, AND ALL FREE GOVERNMENTS ARE FOUND ON THEIR AUTHORITY AND INSTITUTED FOR THEIR BENEFIT; AND THEY HAVE AT ALL TIMES AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO ALTER THEIR GOVERNMENT IN SUCH MANNER AS THEY MAY THINK PROPER.

 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (l), filed suit in the United States supreme court against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin for illegally changing their election laws, which disenfranchised Texas voters who lived within it.

 

Perhaps the United States Supreme Court should have addressed this case for Texas—and 18 states that later joined the suit—which makes for an interesting and mostly contiguous block of sovereign nation-states should they join together in their disfavour of what was done to them.

 

Look at this map and think of what the entire South—except Georgia—and all the way to the Canadian border might look like if the United States military that is now in charge of the nation allows this proven fraud to stand.

 

Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia signed on, while Arizona wrote a supportive amicus brief.

 

Suppose the other defrauded States join the Republic of Texas?

I am not proposing secession and hope it never happens, but if the first 24 hours of the Biden Regime is any indicator, it will.

 

(Con't below - long, but worth the read)

 

https://richardsonpost.com/howellwoltz/20284/will-the-wages-of-democrat-sin-spell-the-end-of-america/

Anonymous ID: 1ac2d1 Jan. 26, 2021, 1:06 p.m. No.12722992   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3012 >>3126 >>3228 >>3277

Texas Judge Blocks Biden's 100-Day Deportation Ban

 

TUESDAY, JAN 26, 2021 - 15:50

A federal judge on Tuesday threw cold water on the Biden administration's 100-day deportation moratorium - a central component of the newly minted president's immigration priorities.

 

US District Judge Drew Tipton, a Trump appointee and former Marine Sergeant, issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) sought by the state of Texas, which sued the Biden administration on Friday in response to a Department of Homeland Security memo which instructed immigration agencies to halt most deportations, according to the Associated Press. Tipton concluded that the Biden administration had failed "to provide any concrete, reasonable justification for a 100-day pause on deportations."

 

Tipton’s order is an early blow to the Biden administration, which has proposed far-reaching changes sought by immigration advocates, including a plan to legalize an estimated 11 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally. Biden promised during his campaign to pause most deportations for 100 days.

 

The order represents a victory for Texas’ Republican leaders, who often sued to stop programs enacted by Biden’s Democratic predecessor, President Barack Obama. It also showed that just as Democratic-led states and immigration groups fought former President Donald Trump over immigration in court, often successfully, so too will Republicans with Biden in office. -AP

 

Acting Homeland Security Secretary David Pekoske had signed the DHS memo on Biden's first day in office which instructed immigration authorities to refocus their efforts on national security and public safety threats, along with any illegal migrants apprehended in the United States after November 1 - a sharp reversal from President Trump's policy which opened deportations up to anyone illegally residing in the country.

 

In the state's court filing, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that the moratorium violated both federal law and an agreement signed between Texas and DHS which required Homeland Security to consult with Texas and other states before taking any actions to "reduce, redirect, reprioritize, relax, or in any way modify immigration enforcement."

 

The Biden administration argued in court filings that the agreement is unenforceable because “an outgoing administration cannot contract away that power for an incoming administration.” Paxton’s office, meanwhile, submitted a Fox News opinion article as evidence that “refusal to remove illegal aliens is directly leading to the immediate release of additional illegal aliens in Texas.”

 

Tipton wrote that his order was not based on the agreement between Texas and the Trump administration, but federal law to preserve the “status quo” before the DHS moratorium. -AP

 

In Paxton's motion requesting the TRO, Paxton wrote: In one of its first of dozens of steps that harm Texas and the nation as a whole, the Biden administration directed DHS to violate federal immigration law and breach an agreement to consult and cooperate with Texas on that law. Our state defends the largest section of the southern border in the nation. Failure to properly enforce the law will directly and immediately endanger our citizens and law enforcement personnel,” adding: “DHS itself has previously acknowledged that such a freeze on deportations will cause concrete injuries to Texas. I am confident that these unlawful and perilous actions cannot stand. The rule of law and security of our citizens must prevail."

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/federal-judge-bars-bidens-100-day-deportation-ban?