Anonymous ID: fe87f7 May 2, 2018, 10:55 a.m. No.1273803   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3877 >>3909 >>4231

>>1273608

>Goyim awakening

Indeed they are

 

>>1273453 >>1273500 (prev bread)

Yup the red-pill on narcissism and JQ and cult-marx are parallel knowings.

 

In times of uncertainty and when under attack, maintaining the touchstone of culture is important. Ours are above knowings. When research slow on board, I think it’s good to discuss. Like this fe:

 

What if the issue of whether Q is (((psy-op))) or slow-walking normies on JQ is moot? Don’t A or B lead to more goyim knowing?

 

A) If Q is /ourguy/ then bringing normies here is a great way to expose them to the issue. Once a person has emotionally accepted the idea of Q/POTUS/)))anons((( as connected to hope/rescue, mind is more open to sustain dissonance when learning rescuers have a rough side. No one's anti-gun after an armed rescuer saves them from imminent harm.

 

B) If Q is (((psy-op))) and thought was to bring normies here to expose them to the ebil nazis hiding in deep dark net, it will backfire on them the same way HRC's outing the alt-right ("Pepe!!") in the campaign did. Only brought more to the knowing

 

If you don't want the truth coming out, the proven method is suppression, memory-holing, never light-shining. (((They))) might try to get ahead of narratives with disinfo, but this one’s a steam engine and they know it. This board has continued its ways for months after Q. Other than a little civ nat for expedience on immediate ops in bigger plan, Q hasn’t done much to dissuade. Coincidence?

 

This is why I think Q is /ourguy/ but am comfy even if he is not. Carry on anons

Anonymous ID: fe87f7 May 2, 2018, 11:06 a.m. No.1273925   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3938

>>1273877

>marginalize / discount

Yes, anons of all ppl know ^^^this^^^ has been VERY effective.

But are we reaching a tipping point where it's becoming less so? I think so. The Kanye thing would have played out very different pre-MAGA.

Anonymous ID: fe87f7 May 2, 2018, 11:25 a.m. No.1274150   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1273909

>Either way it's ok

Didn't mean to imply that.

Very much want Q to be what we hope he is, would suck bigly to find we were punked

 

But have to allow for all possibilities when deciding how to move forward when answers aren't known. Risk/benefit analysis

 

Decision to participate, esp. posting research damaging to cabal, is risky. Point was, after analysis, anon became comfy with that risk