>>12737323 (pb)
FYI that was NOT broadcast live. I don't think you understand camera pool. 15 or more pool cameras shoot the entire thing LIVE...then each news outlet took that footage and made their own version of the inauguration that the "broadcast live". There's no possible way each news outlet could have enough cameras to represent all the camera cuts/edits. Jaysus that would be over 200 or something cameras. Each news outlet has their own version and that is only possible with camera pools. They all agree to one set of cameras then make their own edits. it only has the APPEARANCE of being different footage because each outlet edited the dame file footage their own way.
If you know anything about how live shit is shot there's a GUY who tells the "controller" which camera to cut to. I don't care how good you are no one is that fast. The camera swaps were so rapid that guy would have to be a faster talker than the average auctioneer and the "controller" would have to make no mistakes and be just as fast.
Not possible. Fake inauguration was shot in ONE go with MANY cameras and each news outlet edited together their own version from the same footage.
Then there's this little problem. Reporters NOT allowed into the inauguration to film it...one guy is livestreaming. He says Kamaltoe just got sworn in/was speaking. I saw only bright sunshine. Have you seen a dull cloudy spitting snow version of Kamaltoe being sworn in?