>>1275142 (previous bread re our own q-research approved journalist)
Sara Carter is exactly who I was thinking, too. You beat me to it.
Regarding what "our" job is, I think most anons would not be comfortable in front of a camera. We are most comfortable behind our computers researching and problem solving. Our job would be to educate the journalist.
We could put out our own 4 am talking points
In what q post did he indicate he would not approve of a spokesperson for q-research?
I was thinking non-profit. Just an extension of the patriots redpilling the normies
Maybe we're the beginning of a new political party. The "Q-Party". Maybe q-research is the beginning of a platform for teaching and endorsing candidates?
I have a friend who is in our state House of Representatives. (Republican) He was very interested in learning more about Q and wanted to know how to access. I gave him a quick walk through of Qanon.pub and qresearch. (Sadly, had to warn him to be prepared to be shocked by some of the images out here)
Do you guys remember the anon that began a multiple choice game for the anon questions? That was such a cool idea. Whatever became of that?
I think he will. Again, he's at a state level and maintains a more-than full time job (doctor), family and is active in his church
Q has indicated how many people are monitoring these boards. Surely that would include potential political candidates. I'll bet some good conservative people step forward to fill the shoes of those that have resigned
I'm talking about for redpilling the masses. This anon made Q's questions into an online game or self-test. They would pick what they thought the correct answer was, then click on 'answer' and the answer would go into details that the research team had dug up. It was really pretty neat and a fun way to learn. The anon that started it probably became overwhelmed with the vastness of the project
are you talking about the C-130? There were only 5 on board.
WTF does that mean?