>>1274669 (prev)
>>1274970 (prev)
33 million NOT 3.3 mil.
It is interesting to note that earlier on he was saying over 30 million. Now he is saying 'nearly' 33 million.
He has to know where this 'little experiment' is destined to take place if they have modeled the death toll >30 mil and <33 mil.
Who does he think he is fooling? Him and the W.H.O. think they so sneaky, yet they're so transparent.