check yourself on irony and comedy

advanced forms of expression

talked of by plato and aristotle and stuff specifically for it's artistic elegance

but

you dnot see yet

the shakespeares of the world did not <createirony

they observed it

and made a point to highlight the nature of irony

this is why we say not to have expectation

or to not assume cause ass u me . lalala

okay

so. I have a theory.

Life is usually ironic

not sometimes

like you know what the weather will be tomorrow maybe

but you don't know where yu will be in 10 years

and you can never look back 10 years

and imagine yourself where you are sitting now.

go back 10 more years

did you see yourself

etc

you never

we never

i never see myself.

why do i say?

i see the irony coming..

i know everyone is getting an irony

in their life

i am a natural expression of irony

everyone will be wrong in their assumption of the state of the nation and proper way forward

it will be… out of left field, but hopefully appeal to logic and common sense in us all.

anyway

if you have expectation or assumption

you can change

you can start predicting irony

and be more accurate

in the ability to <predict>

you can predict alot

if you know how to count time

from 010101010101

time is a pattern

a cycle

a revolution

full of revelation

my family taught me revelation was alwyas unfolding

i like that

but they didn't think of it as <godly>

it was a way to <dismissrevelatory conversation found in the Bible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

see i got shit to do

seriously

ya'll dont get it

i say that all the time

i have to make a vision to change the world.

and share cheesy memes

to convince you to help me <dream>

anyway

i did share this for a reason

cause i think it is true

it helps describing the <veils of illusionwe each experience.

>>12751703

It isn't even ironic at the end of the day.

It is just common sense

I am a doctor.

I treat people.

Read your history.

There have always been doctors to treat the sick.

It is only recently, since WW2, that these people studied people like Freud and Jung and began prescribing synthetic pharmeuticals for a general catch all for all inbalance in an indivual.

A doctor does not treat the soul or the person. The official head doctor is trained to identify parts of you and analyze you and stuff. It isn't good doctor work or everyone in society wouldn't be so shit fucked.

I shared this image so you can peak without having to dig. I know it is a boring topic, but you should be aware. It is 101 of life.

You need head doctors.

People become imbalanced

It is part of life.

I just think that many people could use a different kind of mental health treatment

The one based, not in Freud, but in a living soul and a human being seeking to develop themselves, character, or understanding.

Okay.

It is not "ironic" that a soul doctor is in charge of the country

My job, I was hired, basically, to treat the collective psyche of the American public.

Plain and simple.

Yes. That is why I have mockingbird and stuff.

I am a soul doctor.

I am not trying to fix (your) soul.

I will offer valid information and sources of investigation for someone who asks me

but i do have a job to do

on the national level

i have like a soul doctor job.

oh look. all this soul doctor mess up stuff happened back in rome days too. imagine that?

it is just that nobody wants the soul doctor to come back, it must be ego lol

but i gotta come back

it is like my <function

i could not

but i would not fulfill my life

i would suffer

if i did not thrive.

i aint a fucking guru either

i am invisible

and i plan to stay that way

like invisible will be visible

but… teachers don't preach.

do you understand?

preachers don't stand up on sunday and wave a bible at people.

some might, but by in large, no.

i dont care what society looks and calls me

hopefully something positive that reflects reality, like doctor

i would really think i am moire than a sidekick to a physician

it may take a while to get people who do soul work into the professional field

but i think the new fancy military energy cameras are going to clear up alot of this.

i am pretty sure a <soul doctorwill need a vibrational certificate to prove they are <clear of emotional baggage> to a satifactory degree that they may <operate> upon the psyche of a sick person. Sick people are vulnerable, you don't let possibly sick people work on the vulnerable because they giive the neurocity to their patient while hacking into their freud complex centers.

my plan is just to call bullshit on it all

cause it is

look at this shit

it is STILL all over the place

i really think it is malpractice

i am a schizo with a keyboard and can read the entire pharmaceutical thing is not a real deal.

it fixes chemical imbalance that does not exist.

like you can have an inbalance due to your <life conditions>, but peope don't just have some <organicimbalance.

but they are still going on about it

like… yea… but … if you look at it like this….

uh no

having chemical activity in your brain related to hating your spouse or job

is not illness that needs medication

that is a life problem

that needs to be addressed

https://www.dana.org/article/are-we-blaming-brain-chemistry-for-mental-illness/

https://www.amritapuri.org/80420/20ego.aum

https://www.bible.ca/psychiatry/psychiatry-history-church-ministers-first-psychiatrists.htm

Lol

Appaprently i was pretty clear in 2014 lol

I wrote that on an airplane

i have some other stuff

i am reviewing it

it may be <oldbut valid.

The revolution will take control of public assets. The revolution will not take control of private assets. A corporation is not a private asset. Private assets do not include permanent ownership of natural resources, including land. Ownership of land will be converted to lease. Ownership of resources will be placed in the hands of humanity. Corporate salaries exceeding one hundred times the national average, will be reduced to this level.

This is interesting enough. I was a 26yr old dude that had just read a few books and started on a spiritual journey. I did not know of any Lord. I put forth good effort though. I haven't changed much in 10 years except my faith I guess. It is hard to write <truestatements.

I think Individual realities are like fingerprints, many are similar, but each is unique. I could argue for eternity over the true nature of reality and i will likely never determine the absolute truth. I can, however, develop relative truths based on my knowledge and understandings. Relative truths are the facts of life which are I believe are universal to the human experience at this point in human development. Relative truth must be viewed from a third person perspective.

The earth is our shared home.

The natural systems of the earth are required for survival.

The natural world holds great mysteries.

Humans create all social systems.

Humans can create and destroy life

Humans have creative power.

The individual human experience is temporary.

Humans must consume other life.

I been planning revolution this way for a while: 2014

living it now

Revolution should exist as an idea if the alternative is violence. Violence in revolution is not necessary or avoidable. A decision to fight a non-violent revolution does not stop violent action. A physical revolution should not occur before the revolutionary ideas are strong enough to be accepted universally. Revolution should exist as an idea if the alternative is violence. Revolution should be large enough to non-violently restrain actors preserving institutional powers. Non-violent actors must act to restrain revolutionary bodies seeking violence. Non-violent actors should place their physical bodies between the weapons of the state and the revolution. The system does not need to be destroyed in flames and violence. The system can simply be placed in the hands of the revolution. The institutions can be systematically destroyed from within; ‘controlled demolition’.

>>12752046

My lack of the Lord is bleeding here

you can see why I sympathize with the leftist. I wasn't a bad dude, I just didn't know.

My religion is love, I worship the great mystery, and I believe in the power of transformative individual experiences. Love is unconditional. Love can flourish within us, between us, infinitely around us, and infinitely between everything. Love is visible in words, action, and thoughts. Love is not violent. I worship the complexity and unknowable nature of the great mystery. I worship the fact I may not learn the truth about life until death. I worship the nature of the great mystery and I admire each part of its beauty. I do not believe the great mystery exists independently of anything, it is infinitely inseparable. I believe in the power of experience. I believe in the power of transforming myself. I believe others are transformed only when I transform myself. I believe in the simplicity of transformation.

This was my theology when I entered spirituality from atheism and was seeking identify things we DO know and DONT

I obviously would re-work this list

It is interesting though. Wtf happened to the leftists of 2021. I swear it wasn't like this back in 2014.

Humans have vastly different understandings of the great mystery. Individual beliefs about the nature of the great mystery are unique, but often share common core beliefs with specific religious bodies. I can develop universal facts about the nature of the great mystery. The facts must be developed from a third person perspective, and will only be recognized as universal from this perspective.

Humans do not have any universally affirmative facts about the great mystery.

Humans do not know what happens after death.

Humans do not know if the great mystery holds inherent intention.

Humans do not know how life began.

Humans do not know how the great mystery came into existence.

Humans do not know when the great mystery was first acknowledged.

Humans do not fully comprehended the great mystery during the human experience, the complexities are greater than or equal to the complexity of the human brain.

Humans do not know if or what ultimate purpose the great muster serves

Humans do not know if the great mystery is unique to the human experience.

Just cusping out of my first awakening…..

I just finished the Carlos Castaneda book, the active side of infinity. I got it at a church bookstore on my vacation. I have not read the teachings of Don Juan. I do think this is a beautiful account of possibility. The possibility that humans may be in much more control of reality than I ever imagined possible. The first book I requested by name after the death of myself was the ‘An Autobiography of a Yogi’ by Paramahensa Yogananda. It was here I first brought the possibility of instant manifestation or shape shifting into my vision. I comprehend these things in theory, but it seems so impossible. I know I live in the infinite, but my mind tells me there must be limitations. I remember how it was to feel my connection to time for the first time. I was with a guy walking around Miami. I had recently lost my last electronic device, my phone. I had no obligations to anything except food, water, and alcohol. I was walking around with a friend and I kept asking him where we were going and what time it was, he eventually became frustrated. I relaxed and I eventually felt more free living further from linear constraints. The sun took over this job of informing me of the time and I enjoyed this greatly. I think the infinite is probably not linear, but I perceive linearly. Is it possible to perceive myself not only as infinitely connected to the mystery, but through the eyes of its’ infinite nature. If I install the lens of infinite, where are the limits of the human experience, I feel like the answer should be limitless. I think, even if I regard it to be fiction inside of myself, it holds a beautiful story about a humans’ perspective of his experiences.

>>12752089

>>Is it possible to perceive myself not only as infinitely connected to the mystery, but through the eyes of its’ infinite nature. If I install the lens of infinite, where are the limits of the human experience, I feel like the answer should be limitless.

I like this cause now i do talk in wholes

but we have to wonder to get there

we have to think there might be more to know

if we find oursevles knowing it all

well I go look for shit I don;'t know lol

>>12752109

This is Cambell and Hinduism

It is pretty strong though, you can barely tell I don't believe in the Lord.

I was created by a creative force, and this force provided me with the ability to recreate. The nature of creativity is transformation. The transformative capabilities of creativity can be observed in the physical and social reality. The potential of radical transformation is different than understanding reality is malleable. Materials are transformed in the physical reality. Creation in social realities can be observed in individuals, cultures, and institutions. This does not deny the possibility of human creation in less visible spaces, it only acknowledges creation can be universally recognized in observable spaces of the human experience. I often think of creativity as a function of the individual; that person is an artist. The creative potential of humanity is rarely recognized. Creativity is often acknowledged only when an idea or object is transformed into something more complex; a new construction. Creativity in destruction generally refers to a negative action that serves a ‘life-taking’ function. Creative destruction does not have to destroy life, it can destroy past creations that no longer function as ‘life-giving’. Humanity could safely, creatively, destroy the objects and institutions that no longer serve humanity. Humans could, as a species, recreate the physical and social realities, just as they were created.

atleast i was <workingon myself

-how would my life be different if I had not taken some notes 10 years ago?

I am still full of kinks, but none of them clog up my flow like hierarchal power structures. I first believed work was my sickness, I was not designed to work. I quickly determined it was not work, but possibly my relationship to money that was making me sick. I thought I was selling my soul and it was getting me drunk. I found myself drunk without a job too. I next decided it must be that I can’t handle being told what to do, maybe I just need to work on not feeling defensive. I get to work in an environment with a lot of freedom to self-motivate at work and what a learning opportunity. Interestingly enough, I become ill in the presence of hierarchy. I become sick at the display of authority. I become ill in the presence of power structures. My heart begins to feel like it will beat out of my chest. I become filled with emotion I recall so often from my childhood, rage. I can’t determine if this is my spiritual ego defending itself from traditional power structures or if this is the nature of being me. Am I designed to be sensitive to hierarchy? Is this the nature of my being or the nature of my experiences? I think it is possible the nature of my experience coupled with the nature of my being has confused my understanding of authority. I still have this image when I think the word authority. It is Dr. Johnson. I just remember his office. It was all leather furniture with bronze studs. The walls were hung with oil paintings of landscapes. The wood was dark and the environment professional. I see him in his chair, like the CEO of child behavioral problems. I remember him leaning back in his chair and throwing his feet on the desk. I remember him trying to manipulate me. I hated knowing that people were trying to manipulate my emotions and responses. Is it this image that prevents me from having a deeper understanding of authority or did this particular structure have a more substantial influence on my experience? Is the rejection of authoritative structures unhealthy outside of mainstream society?

>>12752127

This is interesting. I am starting to notice the government chasing me.

funny the last line….

>> I imagine I will toss this in the recycling bin at some point, but I want to record this day.

The lines between reality and delusion continue to blur. The thoughts arising in me have brought me thus far. I have believed I was in delusion in other moments, have subdued the idea, only to actualize it later. I wonder if am in danger. I wonder if I am in equal danger telling and not telling my story, am I in danger for being? Who can recognize me and in which way am I wearing my eyes on my sleeve? I wonder how many like myself have actualized. I understand the irreversibility of understanding, but I don’t know how permanently influenced one can be by the dark night of the soul. I want to really share my story, but where does it become dangerous? Where does it become incommunicable? Do I need to communicate my story in a concrete method? Can I tell my story multi-dimensionally? The story has already been told, why do I need to tell mine? I fear losing the forest, I fear becoming, I fear death, I fear responsibility, I fear the loss of joy, I fear the loss of companionship. I fear all these things, but I am willing to face my fears because I know this is what will produce greater understanding of myself. Do I need to become less aware in the face of authority? I feel like my danger was actualized for the first time today. I have had my e-mail messed with, I have had my twitter hacked, probably both unrelated. It just gave me some paranoia. I decided it was just that, paranoia. The flight was weird today. I felt like the staff in the airport was looking at me, they were walking by my row in the gate, many times, and then standing in groups looking. I went outside to smoke a cigarette, the guy came right behind me and cleaned out the little bit of trash that was in it and went back inside. The flight was delayed on the runway for about forty five minutes for a fuel load check. We circled three police vehicles with car lights on and a giant spotlight, then took off into the night. The train had a two hour delay so they could hook more trains to the train. We hooked so many trains and traded so many passengers, I couldn’t tell you what happened. I can tell you when we stopped in the middle of nowhere on the train and they started talking about coupling trains, I moved to the center cart, wrote my name, parents phone # and my blog website on a piece of paper. There was another guy in the car that expressed his similar concern about an hour later. I wonder if he was fearful before that train ride. Am I paranoid or am I experiencing a true reason to panic? I imagine I will toss this in the recycling bin at some point, but I want to record this day.

me whining about life..

i think these are good, cause maybe else feels like I did or something. maybe I took notes for you?

I want to talk about some of the challenges I have faced since I started this exploration. Challenges themselves usually presented themselves as fears. The majority of my challenges almost instantly gave me strength as an individual to continue once I faced my fear. I stumbled along at first with a very rough, but functional, understanding of my experiences. I would still consider it rough, but functional, just a bit smoother. I don’t think the books are necessary, but they drove me deeper into the nature of reality. I remember feeling like I was deep in these books. I remember feeling like my healthier actions and thoughts would be strange. I think I needed to see my ideas and my actions are connected. If I am genuine in my actions and clear with my words, this is how I define myself, and this is who I become. I believe this only functions in new environments, new people, and different experiences. My past experiences will always exist inside of my pre-existing relationships. I don’t know how it happens, nor do I care, but it was like being stuck in my old self. The expected relationships drove my actions and thoughts to some degree or the patterns of communication brought me into conversations about things I used to find most interesting, mostly myself. This brings me to my greatest challenge yet, which was laying my ‘new’ self in the spaces of pre-existing relationships. I found this to be most difficult in practice. The images of myself inside others may never erase. The way individuals from pre existing relationships perceive my actions is not important to my health or need for approval. The relationships are burdened by my old self, which doesn’t mean I shouldn’t grow the relationships. I just want to be conscious something deeper is going on in these spaces I used to exist. I think it is about how new relationships perceive the new self. This is who I am at the present. The relationships I created when I was unhealthy require extra strength to alter. I am also still challenged to care for my body, it’s not that I don’t care for my body, I just perceive it as a struggle. I don’t comprehend the value of physical longevity, I comprehend it theoretically, but I don’t embody this in action. I know this does not make sense, it just is.

>>12752171

No buddy

Dr Phil lives right here with you

you can call me the Warden if you want

last i chekced this is a great awakening and this is relevant info

if you missed the waking up stuff

well. read a book

I want to talk about some of the challenges I have faced since I started this exploration. Challenges themselves usually presented themselves as fears. The majority of my challenges almost instantly gave me strength as an individual to continue once I faced my fear. I stumbled along at first with a very rough, but functional, understanding of my experiences. I would still consider it rough, but functional, just a bit smoother. I don’t think the books are necessary, but they drove me deeper into the nature of reality. I remember feeling like I was deep in these books. I remember feeling like my healthier actions and thoughts would be strange. I think I needed to see my ideas and my actions are connected. If I am genuine in my actions and clear with my words, this is how I define myself, and this is who I become. I believe this only functions in new environments, new people, and different experiences. My past experiences will always exist inside of my pre-existing relationships. I don’t know how it happens, nor do I care, but it was like being stuck in my old self. The expected relationships drove my actions and thoughts to some degree or the patterns of communication brought me into conversations about things I used to find most interesting, mostly myself. This brings me to my greatest challenge yet, which was laying my ‘new’ self in the spaces of pre-existing relationships. I found this to be most difficult in practice. The images of myself inside others may never erase. The way individuals from pre existing relationships perceive my actions is not important to my health or need for approval. The relationships are burdened by my old self, which doesn’t mean I shouldn’t grow the relationships. I just want to be conscious something deeper is going on in these spaces I used to exist. I think it is about how new relationships perceive the new self. This is who I am at the present. The relationships I created when I was unhealthy require extra strength to alter. I am also still challenged to care for my body, it’s not that I don’t care for my body, I just perceive it as a struggle. I don’t comprehend the value of physical longevity, I comprehend it theoretically, but I don’t embody this in action. I know this does not make sense, it just is.

>>12752177

fascinating.

I am not gonna filter you

but i will be looking for that organic content!

seriously

like

"YOUR FILTERED"

fucking retards

like i dunno

why would i stop doing it cause someone says filter lol

I remember hearing the phrase, changing the narrative. I now see this phrase more clearly. It is about changing the language we use to relate to the world. I think storytelling needs to be fluid and always relative. When mythology is created as a sacred absolute truth, it loses value over time. I believe maybe the sacred part of truth is that it is always relative. I believe words used to discuss truth lead to confusion and disagreement because of their subjective nature. Is it possible to develop a fluid mythology in which the human species can agree upon? Or is this a process of fluid storytelling? Is the story the same when you write it down or is the personal emphasis on the story too important? Can you listen to a tape recording of a story and find meaning? Is the storytellers’ presence required to derive maximum significance to the listening individual. Can a consensus be reached on the nature of reality? Can we draw up god into a universally accepted structure? I don’t think this means eliminating or discrediting any specific path, but sharing experiences with different ideas. I am not sure it matters if you find god inside or outside, as long as one is safe to oneself and others. Mythology, of course, is also personal. I am not talking about people believing in the same idea of ‘god’, but acknowledging some basic ideas inherent to the need for mythology and the understanding the nature of our existence. I believe many people will hold onto their old ways of understanding their place in the world. This is a right of separation. I don’t think an individual should be forced or coerced to seek a change in consciousness. It may be well accepted in the future that less matured consciousness are damaging and should be uprooted for their harms. I think it is important to leave these structures in place. It may be quite reasonable to think a young person in an alternative community may venture into the world of separation. A place where the ego can be developed, choices can be explored, sexuality can be tinkered with. The world of separation will be tempting for as long as it exists. I believe the longer a teenager can exist in separation and still have the capacity to return to community? Would the world of pleasure be too overwhelming for a well-adapted post modern teenager? Could one become lost in the world of separation as the ego grows and begins to protect itself? I wonder if separation will be more like an addiction. Many people will try it and think, this is stupid, this is not for me, why would anyone do this, especially for their whole life. I think other will fall into it hook, line, and sinker. Can the ego take over a life long exposure to wholeness? Will a whole child even want to explore this space, or will they be forced by their communities to undergo this experience as a mechanism for personal growth. I wonder if the immensity of personal revelation is proportionate to the time spent in separation developing the ego? It may not be beneficial to develop the ego in separation, the ego may do just fine in community, but without the experience of separation, will the revelation be as powerful? If we remain in interconnected space, how does one appreciate heaven and hell?

>>12752214

try cartoon network

>>12752204

i am just dropping old content really

i am the president ya'll

i gotta record this stuff

can you not tell?

look at all this stuff

you think i been larp'ing human development for 10 years to come and mess with you all?

>>12752231

it isn't liberal

that is uneducated

if you read my post

i was a liberal hindu when i wrote it

>>12752231

I

is actually proper

you don't talk of others

you speak of yourself

and the whole as one

you are in correct.

you cannot say We here

you cannot say I here

you can only <look towards other people>

and never yourself

that is sick meme

you need to adjust

or dont

but dont tell me i am the fool

when your wisdom

is showing

micro-dick

>>12752251

YOU ARE AN IDIOT

i wrote it 10 years ago

i wasn't even a Christian

you never did anything 10 years ago?

fucking idiot

i bet you cannot show me an organic document of any quality

you have smears

and no production

show me an organic writing and i will call you smart

until then you are teh sheep for shearing