Subway’s Tuna Sandwiches Don’t Actually Contain Tuna, Lawsuit Claims
The ingredient billed as “tuna” in Subway’s sandwiches and wraps is “made from anything but tuna,” a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California last week claims.
The suit, filed by Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin of Alameda County, alleges that the “tuna” sold at the popular sandwich chain is in fact a “mixture of various concoctions.”
Dhanowa and Amin claim they conducted independent lab tests of “multiple samples” of tuna from a number of California Subway locations, and results show the ingredient is “a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna, yet have been blended together by defendants to imitate the appearance of tuna,” according to the complaint.
An attorney for the pair, Shalini Dogra, did not elaborate on what specific ingredients were revealed in the lab tests.
“We found that the ingredients were not tuna and not fish,” the attorney told The Washington Post.
Subway has denied the claims, stating in a press release that the sandwich chain serves 100 percent wild-caught tuna.
https://m.theepochtimes.com/subways-tuna-sandwiches-dont-actually-contain-tuna-lawsuit-claims_3676886.html?
Is this the human meat revelation? Which leads me to: could humans consuming other humans lead to autoimmune diseases?