> Im an ex Bernie person
Wouldn't an actual former Bernie supporter say, ex-Bernie supporter?
No battle, no need to assume so. Autist detailing at work, particulars & details matter where others wouldn't mind Thanks for the reply, my suspicions were calmed by your answer.
Addressing your original statement re: Bernie, I also wouldn't mind seeing more about him brought back to the board.
>I think the problem is the majority making money off the movement have no real interest in the movement. Rather than just being honest with everyone that it's simply a business op, they deceive their followers.
>Nothing wrong with making money just be honest about it.
In a nutshell, yes! America is open for business again, no shame in being a businessman/woman and making some money. Yet, ethics & integrity matter.
>Look at Youtube. In it's early days, everyone created and shared videos for enjoyment. After monetization arrived, the entire mindset for mostly the larger channels changed. When the rules were altered decreasing earnings, all these people started whining and begging for money constantly. They showed their real interest is making money not in making enjoyable videos.
GOOG has manipulated said sector of entertainment well. YouTube has slowly become MeTube$.
No
o7
Q, Apr 2 >>884799
[Pope] will be having a terrible May.
Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT>
Dark to LIGHT.
TRUTH.
Power - the ability to do work. The ABILITY is here, which is why chans were chosen. Perfection is not expected, and is not the goal. Anons getting it, that aids in parallel construction and is the primary focus, yet not the only one. Anons "not getting it" as you say, aids in plausible deniability. Other than anons trying to distract, detract, derail, discredit, mark themselves (monitored in real time). There's no lose here, it's win-win-win.