My own fucking father is a most worshipful master.
Makes for difficult conversations, and he HATES Trump.
Speaking of…
http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/mackeys_encyclopedia/q.htm
>The Hebrew letter p, Q or K, pronounced Koph. The seventeenth letter in the English and modern Latin alphabets. In the Phenician or Ancient Hebrew its form was one circle within another. Its numerical value is 100. The Canaanite signification is ear.
"The military took you under their wing so we will destroy the military."
Well, it IS a Chair Force (cabal) plane, not Navy or Marines.
I kind of get the muh profane can't have this information without discipline, but it conflicts with Christ.
Yeah, I went to go see an old friend perform at a function and this black girl started chatting me up… to the point where the girl I came to see left in a huff afterward without talking to me. Still giving me the silent treatment. (I know for a fact she's in it.)
His father (my grandpa) was a knight of Malta.
My uncle is in it, my aunt is OES, cousins too. I let them all know I know and have no intention of joining. Then a girl I used to date who is in it showed up at my church (Catholic… which is pretty much a lodge after Vatican II).
I was also in AA for while… or should I say A.A… LOL.
Ain't sucking no dick for muh fraternal priveiges. Was probably raped as a baby, but I don't remember it.
Don't blame Shlomo at the deli for stuff Hershel and Benny do in the basement of the warehouse.
>The fed gov
You man clowns?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_response
>In United States law, the term Glomar response, also known as Glomarization or Glomar denial,[1] refers to a response to a request for information that will "neither confirm nor deny" (NCND) the existence of the information sought.[2] For example, in response to a request for police reports relating to a certain individual, the police agency may respond with the following: "We can neither confirm nor deny that our agency has any records matching your request." Such a response is invariably a true statement, regardless of whether the entity actually posseses the information requested. Accordingly, Glomar responses are favored for their ability to reject a request for information without lying and claiming the information does not exist.[2] There are two common situations in which Glomarization is used. The first is in a national security context, where to reject a request on security grounds would implicitly suggest that the documents or programs that the requester is seeking indeed exist, but to confirm their existence would mandate their disclosure. The second instance is in the case of privacy, in which a response as to whether a person is or is not mentioned in an entity's (e.g., law enforcement, mental health facility, etc.) files may have a stigmatizing connotation.[1] Glomar responses are commonly associated with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
CIA wanted to build a ship to recover a Soviet sub. They made a cover story about some Jacques Cousteau shit and laundered the money through Howard Hughes and "refused to confirm or deny" it's existence.
Sounds a bit like Red October.