p.s. i did find the archeology dig on that ancetory

not direct ancestor

but related to somehow in their past

they didnt know eachother

but they may have had a common ancestor 5000years earlier

anyway

i noted that i had know way to know if they lived there

but the archeology suggests it was a dwelling area.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/78474655.pdf

>>12759239

this is good for a point though

it shows the complexity of following ones dna story from modern to the past

i try to find the past as far back as i can

know my present

and work from <both sidesto reach a middle point

working back through my genealogy and <recordsfrom christening and life in european culture vs my ancient siberian self.

i dont see that siberia crap

i did that a long time ago

dont know whre i generated that siberia thing

i thought it was from this tool

anyway

for sake of showing you what i mean

this is as old as i see on here

so i can look up

the name

of the body they discovered

i dont see it

but i know yu can, because i have before

anyway i dont see that one

but for the sake of moving on

i can show you "hungarian"

i dont expect hungarian to much different from hungarian of the past

all the hungarians didn't bail out of hungary.

my relative could have been <passing through

was i a native to the hunarian area?

or was this body found in the area?

anyway.

this is an interesting chart

basic view of hybridzation

they are using <labelsfor grups i am unfamiliar with

i would need to use their map key and determine what each one means

but you get the idea

you can see the africa on the bottom

and the europe on the top

basically a list of %neandrathal %neadrathal

but it aint that easy

you cant just go from nation to nation

calling them cavemen

>>12759338

>>12759338

anyway

i lost an image

you can see

you can dig a bit on the archeological discoveries if you want

anyway

we still gotta run the jtest

so

why does gedmatch and wegene offer me <differentresults about how much jew i have in me

oaky

on gedmatch

select <admixture heritagefrom main menu

select <eurogensfrom drop down

click next

now select Jtest instead of eurogenes13

plug in your kit #

now america

i have told you

i am 2.5% neandrathal

this test on the left says i am 1.58% ashkenazi jew

the one on the right

shows <zerojewish blood

but my mother is 3.5% neandrathal

so that neadrathal blood shows somewhere else

it isn't obviouis

cause

if jew = neandrathal

and my mother is more neandrathal

why do i should jew?

and my mother does not…

>>12759389

i dont know exactly the <bestway to do this

you just need to knw there are tools

and everyne on the interent

is dumb

they are not looking for ancient neandrathal % in there DNA test

they have other stuff they are working on lol

anyway

i reveiwed the list

the only <noticedplace that could explain my mother being 50% higher in neandrathal blood than me

so.

what about eastern mediatarian?

okay

so what is that

i have to type in

Jtest + western mediterrian

to determine… who is this group

great

they are from a regon

when were they there?

do some people have 50% western meditarian ?

i am gonna look. i can show you

you can see some other stuff

which ccould make oyu think,..

look.

me and my mom are east african

but my dad was was more african

cause i went up alot in % of east african compared to my mother

i am more <original?>

me on the left

i have a little middle eastern

i have a little south asian

my mother has NONE

which is strong to me

cause i can see a bloodline split pretty far back in my family

somewhere in the middle east/south asia area…

my mom and dad split families

or we would share common ancestry from the region

is my father a hebrew?

and my mother an egyptian?

i dont actualy have the anwers

but for the sake of showing you how easy this stuff <BECOMES

once you have someone explain it

i will figure out real quick

if i notice anything

i <getit

i know where i come from

i dont need %'s and admixtures and DNA test to figure out… ilife

it doesn't matter

in the whole scheme of things i am a genetic hybrid from your government

all of project monarch is

BUT

am i bad dude?

i am lowest 30th percentile of this blood

who are all these other millions and millions of people with more?

maybe we should all be put in ovens

but why do the <more neandrathal% get the jobs and money and all that

how does it… work?

why does 1% more blood of an ancient hominid impact the modern world to such a high degree….

>>12759446

just to give you an idea

here is a message board

with people not really looking for neadrathal

but trying to figure out why all the testing is goofy

they share different tests and nobody really gets it

everyone looks for someone else on the internet to tell them their DNA story

but that dont exist

you need to look a bit

i would stay away from rabbit holes

that are confusing

just find <clear pointsto say okay

i can <KNOWthat

i know my grandparents

i believe my aunt about my great great parents

the rest.. i cannot <provei am related

i ahve DNA now

so i can do a little better

but if 20 people all say they have a relative in the united sates

the internet will tell those 20 people they share a common relative

but what if all 20 people are using bad information to say <that was the guy that passed the dna>

how do you know it was that persons dna?

you can all share a surname and dna from a common relative

that got seed from outside the bloodline.

i can show you hear for example

if i goto ancestry

it says i am related to the <justicefamily of america cause that is the surname that is passed down

but MULTIPLE people who come from the same line have submitted DNA

there is no relation

the line is broken but the surname remains

anyway

just saying

that if it doesn't make sense somewhere

just realize everything is goofed

cause i gotta go find this on my own

ancestry/23and me dont update my profile to account for this

in fact the major sites are misleading cause still to this day it recommends an ancestor for me that is inccorect.

it says "probable ancestor" and it gives me one option that i <knowis wrong.

https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/justice/about/results

>>12759517

https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/37892-How-much-East-Med-do-you-score

oh this is the discussion of the Jtest and meditarrian stuff

you can see

they just post results

waiting on someone to tell them sometihng

and nobody does..

anyway

i will tell you more about this "western meditarian"

i have a theory

i showed ashkenazi jewish

my mother showed none

what if my father was ashkenazi?

and my mother was sephardic?

do they …. show the askenazi blood more accurately?

i actually think it is true

that sephardic is <less establishedand harder to monitor the flow through time

>>12759536

seriously

if you have never looked at this

it can be <FUCKINGoverwhelming

it is the <NOISE>

there is so much noise

it gets twisty turny and confusing

before you get anywhere

if you can't see anything

step back

and go to a new… part of the story

always

look for abnormality compared to other relatives

try and get a parent or an aunt or uncle

cause a brother or sister

will just be like you

and you cant see any split

if there is one.

>>12759566

i find new stuff too

i gave all this up a while ago

to look at more recent genealogy

for family line from myself back

rather than ancient DNA markers

but.

A note about the above: You learn something new every day. I remember how surprised I was when I discovered Indian Jewish DNA in my results. I learned that India was home to an ancient Jewish community. Now I’ve discovered that West Africa also had an ancient Jewish community: the Jews of the Bilad al-Sudan (אַהַל יַהוּדּ בִּלַדּ אַל סוּדָּן).

There were West African Jewish communities who were connected to known Jewish communities from the Middle East, North Africa, or Spain and Portugal (what we would term Sephardic Jews) – as well as trading and living alongside the Berbers. Various historical records attest to their presence at one time in the Ghana, Mali, and Songhai empires, then called the Bilad as-Sudan from the Arabic meaning Land of the Blacks. These are people and places I have ancient genetic links to.

>>12759577

p.s.

MANY of you are related to Berber.

berber moor = german

if your family says they are german

or you are in the midwest

you are a moor

not direct

but you can say

ohhh

i am a bit of a black jew from africa

and this is how i got to germany

and later

britain

and

america

so i was noticing a Berber(moor) and Arab confict

so you can see early conflict

you can also see the "basques" represented as a different population in the article

sooo

i dunno

you gotta look around

i can already tell you

not exaclty

i dont need a % to get it

i can look at your skin complexion, facial structure, and skull

then know your % to a reasonable degree

1% neadrathal looks alot different from 2% looks alot different from 4% which probably look different from 8% etc

who is the highest % neandrathal?

okay

so my mother is in the 70th percentile at 3.5%

could 70-80 = 7%

80-90 = 14%

90-95 = 28%

97.5 = 56%

you see the problem?

is that the higher you go in %

the less people there are

cause they are non-hybridized bloodliens

and most people have not descended direct from the lines of pharoahs and medieval kings that inbreed/cross-breed with similar genetics

between west aftrica.

https://www.scotsman.com/whats-on/arts-and-entertainment/scotlands-dna-descended-lost-tribes-and-related-napoleon-2479111

As a large and diffuse ethnic group, the Moors consisted mostly of Berbers from Morocco and Western Algeria, sub-Saharan Africans from Mauritania, Northern Senegal, and Western Mali, Arab Bedouins, and Arab elite mostly from Yemen and Syria. Most writings on Moors applied darkness of skin as a trait for any and every Muslim invader of Europe.[58]

if you find the very common surname "moore" in your family

it might be good to consider this

a place where you went from being a black african to a white european

Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people,[3] and the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica observed that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value."[4] Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, and Muslim Europeans.[5]

>>12759660

dont call me a shill

i dont know what it is

i think maybe a "muslim european"

is not "islam"

but just is what i tis

some people say jesus was an arab jew

i dont know

abraham came from india region

soooo

Muslim Europeans

look it up

you cant deny where you came from cause it says teh word muslim on it

you will just get lost

people dont see where i am yet either

i think Christ was the teacher, but the bloodline comes from ancient india and the vedics

i think german americans descnd <dominantfrom the indian subcontinent

and i think british americans descend from….

who knows where

i will call it hell for now

until i figure it out

atlantis vs lemuria

is lemuria the sub-continent africa

is scotland near or is it atlantis??

sooo you have

atlantis vs lemuria

scotland vs india

america vs china <free tibet?>

>>12759695

just think

imageine for a minute

that you were

closer as republican country folks

to an arab askenazi jew from africa

rather than a finnish sephardic egyptian pharoah from who knows where

trust me

end of the day

it is okay

but just think

they are liars to you

they tell the republican germans in america that tehy are aryan and shit

they tell you that you are one of them

but you are not

you are opposite genetics

beltway/utah/cali = british = egypt<pharoah= finland = atlantis

republicans/midwest = german = egypt<hebrew> india > lemuria

so they are lieing about your history i think

i am german

but i am a mutt

so i got something different going on

then lots of you

if both your parents are from teh same town

they prbably have similar genes

people dont realize

how CLOSE we are too our neighbors in genetics

we are not as "snowflakey" as we think

the "melting pot" has not been here that long

and other "melting pots" were called rape, warfare, conquering or consenual hybridization of differnt Kings and Queens

marry a royal kid here get one hynrid

marry another kid other than and get a different hybrid

it actually is <smart thinking>

to bio-diversify your genetics

if you have one partner

you have limited <alterationsfor biological sucess

if you have a black baby, a mexcan baby, achinese baby adn an american baby

all these groups can fight and kill eachother and it doesnt matter what happens

cause though the winner, your bloodline willl carry on..

… i mean, you can't guarantee

but the more bio-diverse you make your genetics, the more sucessful will be your offspring over time

let me show you

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/01/jeffrey-epstein-seed-human-race-report

you see

epstein is a creep

but

it doesn't make your creepy to know it is wise to biodiversify and "breed" intentionally

but

it is a matter of .. doing disgusting and unreasonble shit

like

i hope my sperm goes to a seed bank and some african woman that is super sub-saharan decides to get pregnant with my white european seed

i have 2 distant DNA groups combining to form a new group

that wouldnt exist outside the "globalized world"

just know

when you start getting into all this shit

it isn't as easy to say

ohhh my god

what a creeep

he wanted to breed

it is natural to breed or want to breed

but he was not doing right

he was a creep

hell

look at war

any conqueror knew

they were literally injected their genetics into the population as they raped and pillaged the town.

if you have STR markers you can check against napolean i guess

https://www.igenea.us/en/napoleon

anyway

yea

everyone doesn't need to biodiversify

maybe that is <greedy?>

but to not understand it is based in a … biology and science that makes sense

you stay blind that way

so knowing science doesn't mean you open a breeding center in new mexico lol

>>12759790

i am a choad cause i told you republicans in america are related to an ancient arab jew?

i mean

keep white jesus if you want

that is mason jesus

cabal jesus

but whatever

they erased your history to enslave you

the people you do not want to be are the ones the cabal told you to hate because they are your true ancestors

if you are american

you are likely a german arab jew from africa and the middle east

it is okay

you look pretty white today

it wouldn't be bad if you werent

but lose the aryan delusion

cause all you country people that do the white power and KKK shit are not fucking aryan lol

like you bred with aryans like lal white people

but your neandrathal blood or your finish/north atlantic ancient ET jew stuff is different

you are not aryan

you are not mason

you are not a pharoah

you may be mixed

but your heart is >dominated< by your major <origin>

>>12759846

i am just gonna say this

Jesus is a teacher

Jesus did't invent the Lord

there was spirituality and understand and faith before Jesus showed up on the scene

so abraham wanderd into teh dessert from teh vedic regions of india

abraham started islam/christian/jew

but what was before abrahaM?

so abraham came from vedics

vedic pre-abraham abraham > ambrahamic religion > jesus >

then

vedic pre-abraham buddha/hindu(?) >eastern stuff >

you are basically related to all this relgious stuff that is not mason science and shit

your faith reflects hindu understandin but you dont know that cause you dont read it

hindu is not even a religion

the british called the native vedics Hindu because they lived near the Hindu region

hindu came about in the 1800s

did it <startthen… or did it get a label or teacher?

same thing with jesus

jesus began christianity

but their was God before

the Lord still made everything

it just wasn't taught by the Teacher.

okay the top one is similiarity between christ and krishna

the bottom is an argument against

but i think the arguemnt is dumb

they are arguing over whether Krishna was <firstand Jesus was a <copy> of <Krisha> and stuff

you will know more than me with a little research

butttt

it seems they dont need to <copyeach other or be each other

the argument is whether krishna died on a cross and stuff

like no,… he lived a different life and stuff

krishna was <of the faithof abrahams parents

Jesus was <????of abrahams parents

did mary and joseph teach Christ about faith or their family or upbringing?

people act like God magically poofed a grown man into existence

what bout the early life of Christ?

was he not taught the faith of his people before he because the teacher?

https://www.learnreligions.com/christ-krishna-connection-1770450

https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/KrishnaChrist.htm

>>12759955

Christianity arose with Christ and the teaching.

Faith and the Lord existed before Jesus.

That is my opinion.

I am open to hear an argument.

but I think people are just confused.

Christianity was started by Christ

Faith and the Lord existed before Christ

maybe under different names

but that doesn['t change the understanding of the Lord

how does God telling everyone what to call him?

are the mechinical principles of energy null/void pre-Jesus?

is there no quantum field that stores energy?

was there no religion?

did the Lord not make everyhing?