>>12762069 (lb)
This Statement says it all. Who is playing both sides ??
If Kennedy had really been against the war, if he had simply denied the British the chance to keep
Kent, Kent could have spilled the beans about what Roosevelt was doing and the outraged would
have destroyed Roosevelt’s chances to fool the American people. Instead, Roosevelt was able to
proceed and develop the elements for the Pearl Harbor attack. While Kennedy pretended to be
against the war, he was serving as an intimate accomplice in maneuvers designed to fool the
American people. This is a good example of how even today the public is looking to certain public
officials to save them. They think that these politicians will try everything possible to help them fight
the system, so when they fail to beat the system, the people think they have been beaten fairly. TO
BE CONTINUED