>>12766282 pb
>>12766218 pb
as far as him being "into " children
That judgment is based upon his love letters, he published on his site, to little pretty girl child - a la Lewis Carroll
The romantic drawings of children, the kitschy style of his art (another tell for that personality type)
And his visits to nude camps on islands where children are present and where he uses them there for models for sketching.
All circumstantial. but its doubtful all those things would crop up along with him releasing, in part, such sensitive info;
As my reasoning goes.
He's definitely a gate keeper, so you figure it out.
At first I resisted the notion but many very smart people I was in touch with at the time I followed him cut him off completely as a source because of the child thing. I didn't because I took what I could - that was very good. You can learn a lot about how to analyze a photograph by reading his material.
What turned me away from his work was when half the essays became to be about "Muh Jew"
After so much has come out around the prevalence of people in power having proclivities in the child "admiration" category then the coincidence around Mathis became more real.
I would never believe he was pedo sadist. But you never know? Seems the Philo / love / romantic part is more prominent in him?
I have the citations stored away somewhere, but not going to dig them out.
His work in any case would stand on its own. Also the fact that he goes heavily into unsupported "Muh Jewery" which increased over time as his essays became thinner (he'd roped in enough followers for his project by then?) The proportionate force of the "But the grandmother had a Jewish name" became greater and greater as I experienced it, until almost half of the essay was about how the genealogy connected someone with some name or other.
He wasn't / isnt'? systematic enough on that to make it any more than gobbledygook. No logic. Which you know would be strange for him, since he is otherwise very logical - to the extreme; as a mathematician. So it had to be deliberate..
The teacher is the material, not the man?