>>12788101 (pb)
won't reasonable people conclude as follows: "if the elections were not fair, it's not a coup, it's a counter coup"
that's what it seems reasonable people would conclude.
they store their silver in a false narrative?
perhaps you should modify that statement
?
they might say to send those men to harm's way, that doesn't mean, that now a days, that it will happen as suggested by the cabalitorri
go back to bed.
a bit touchy aren't you?
you collectivize young men as 'our sons' and then march them off to harm and someoen who suggests that times have changed and those people's words aren't orders for anyone anymore, you loose you mind and attack me?
free speech is what I have.
what yo have is a job as a shill for the losing side.
'the whole . . . infrastruce'
false narratives start like that.
of course they 'degrade' something.
and they report it was 'the whole infrastructure'
because they give themselves all these false accomplishments.
this person who made this tweet in not the leader of most Americans.
so you really needed that explained?
i imply that they . . . have it only . . . in falsehood.
thus they store it inside of there too.
it's a play on words and a snarky ironic comment that has no sauce and everyone that sees it knows it is a quip and obvious word play.
or they need it to be explained because they've been up all night.
Burma is the story today.
why do you make the false connection to MAGA in your meme?
you go from hanging carcass to joy joy joy, and I got that by a cursorial glance.
why would anyone want to walk down through your depraved narrative when the subject of it seems abomidible?
like a curse or a spell.
I did type that wrong and thought of what it implied and said: they will not be able to resist this and further reveal themselves as being . . .
now that's an embellishment.
when I saw it was misspelled I said 'huh, that's a clever turn of phrase. if they repond it further proves that they are a puppy dog needing a good master.
but you're a real person so stop.
all parties in the slave/master relationship
are slaves .
none of them have libertud
everyone who lurks here knows that only a shill does the 'oh, why didn't my predictions come true' bitch-scold post in the early AM.
you're out of work, curious, bored, a newbie?
maybe you are a true cultist: you are so far in it you think it's normal.
each person here is an individual
do not fold, spindle, or mutilate.
listen: if you see something, say something.
what is the volume of that?
how big a vault would that fit in?
you got it wrong there, bucktarious.
I describe what they do and then they sputter and spurge.
it's like if you saw a steam tank and it has a pressure valve and you can see that it's too high indare so , you use the interlock and safely release it.
because you can tell if you don't it might go
KA POW!
that's what free speech does, it lets the pressure out.
that's what discriptive anti-shilling is for.
it's not 'control' it's just being.
seeing you as a cult groomer here trying to make a comm channel into your seedy back-channel.
'where the board is at'
the sum of the posts is the sum of the people who posted.
a 'board' is a place to post not a person.
these two do their 'free speech is a cult' banter.
they play off each other.
'pillow' was a made up person to cover the deletion of posts.
the banter between this one and the other one is a scripted 'here is what it is' dialog where they pepper it with false assumptions.
if you're only titular, mitch?
this is an interesting day for the narrative to get a spin around the track.
oh how will the public react if it were known (if it would be known in a conjecture)
that it is
Titular Mitchular
the spokes guy in charge of a council that has lost it's function due to the fraud of a stolen election?
and that's already been deemed and declared?
if it were true it would be deemed 'classified'.
does the governance in DC have an 'open secret' classification?
everyone knows it but everyone pretends that isn't what it is?
the 'naked emperor' clause?
a classification to say that the 'Sgt Shultz' response is needed, necessary, and the only exceptible response?
I ask rethorically.
because if such a classification did exist, eeryone would need to know about it.
and if you really really dumb, you're the one who ordered solar panels that need to be installed.
admit it:
"I know nottthhing, nothing!"
but it does seem that the narrative that they are for ordinary people is incorrect.
there is little or no longer term value in having solar panels.
the cost of maintenance and the small return mean: it's always a money loser.
Plus: the profit in them is only in an upfront subsidy.
or if you are able to cuckle a municpality to a 'service agreement' and they 'host' your 'array' on their land. they pay a lease to you.
you got it all paid for for free.
it's called a 'system of graft' or 'a grift.'
like is the gove in WASHDC says 'we will pay for all purchases of these kinds of lights' and then a town says 'we will lease those kind'
and the brother in law buys all the lights and he leases them to the town .
but the lights were supposed to be free.
that's the only way that the bad-tech is ever profitible: through a system of graft for some well connected few.
the Paris Accords are the recodification of global fuedalism paid for through 'green credits'.
so many unsustainible 'energy infrastruture' developments that pretend to create a 'green future' are merely the excuse for a new system of global welfare for the secret aristocracy of the new world order.
THis is how it seems to many, and we see as that, and would love to hear a different explanation that isn't just a rich connected aristocrat doing a 'you must agree-splaination'