Anonymous ID: 19695c Feb. 3, 2021, 8:24 a.m. No.12810805   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0842

>>12810782

>read the constitution

It's all in the interpretation. They convinced themselves that changing the dictionary changed the constitution. up means down, left means right, "shall not" means "shall". "infringe" means "white supremacism".

 

So in their mind, it's all legal.

 

remember "what do you mean, 'is'"

Anonymous ID: 19695c Feb. 3, 2021, 8:31 a.m. No.12810858   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1505

>>12810842

>Need a block-chain binary language that is immutable.

I've said for 30 years that laws/regulations need a META - a set of descriptions and discussions of the intents and bases. At least that's what a free country would have.

 

Our rulers love the wiggle room that legalese gives them. Which means lack of freedom. Unamerican. Implausible Republic.

 

Scalia understood this.

 

Remember they WANT implausible republic. Started with Nixon. They would have started with LBJ but the republican was chosen as the main hate. This is very coordinated.

 

China = implausible republic = slavery

Anonymous ID: 19695c Feb. 3, 2021, 8:36 a.m. No.12810882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12810863

>Pete Butt does not appear to use a Bible when being sworn in.

That's OK. Go tell the muhpublicans on twatter - they still want to suck Pence penis (in a repressed way of course)

 

I'm just kidding pence is ourguy behind 7 layers of psyop of course

Anonymous ID: 19695c Feb. 3, 2021, 9:21 a.m. No.12811133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1173

"Going against" doesn't quite explain it Nikki.

 

It's a [very obvious] foreign-backed attempted coup/color revolution.

 

Literally aligned not even with the United States, but a particular subgroup of the US which has proven its disloyalty to the constitution (1st bills introduced go against 100s of years of US legal interpretation) just ascended to power in the world's most obvious fraudulent election ever (you disagree but we'll see how that plays out)

 

They moved this neo-lenin in during the bidan inaug, then promoted the "protests" from the embassies FFS. Couldn't even use a backchannel? Had to be that obvious?

 

Any leader not withstanding that would be derelict of duty, and I hope to God almighty that we have backbones in the US willing to do the same.