BIDEN LEASES 700 MILLION ACRES OF U.S. LAND TO CHINA

to grow crops which they sell BACK to US.

This is the first I've heard of this story.

h/t

gab.com/BreckWorshamOfficial.

I don't know if she provides any links to her

statement though, because I don't have Gab.

All there is is the Biden Admin FACT SHEET which

is too long to read and I don't think it would actually

state that in there.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/27/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-executive-actions-to-tackle-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad-create-jobs-and-restore-scientific-integrity-across-federal-government/

But, who knows.

Worth a dig maybe?

>>12810943 lb

Just WHO EXACTLY are living in the

White House right now besides 46,

Handler No. 1, the Mrs.(Handler No. 2)

and the grandchild?

>>12811659

Well, okay.

For APPEARANCES SAKE then,

who are they SAYING is living in OUR HOUSE?

>>12811768

Yeah, I wasn't sure if she was being

hyperbolic or what but that is a yuge

chunk o'land, that's for sure.

>>12811845

Have the decodeanons Qdropped it yet?

Always interesting to see what his

tweets end-up connecting to.

>>12811831

That's the thing.

I don't have Gab, so I don't know if she

added any more info to the thread that

would support her assertion.

I didn't think it would be in the document,

but glad you were able to speed through

it and let us know at least.

Maybe someone who has Gab can

look and even message her even

or something.

>>12811950

hmmm…

kek

Thanks, anon.

>>12812002

It's been a while since I watched

the whole series.

What happened in that episode

that I should keep an eye out for?

>>12811813

I've seen both The Called and Stone's

first interview with Juan.

Still don't really have a clue as to who

this guy is or WHY he's getting such

wide "press".

One of the things that stood out from the

Stone interview was he didn't correct

Stone when Stone brought up the whole

"speculation" about the inauguration citing

the girls in white and pink(?), who was Natalie, by the way,

being in one angle of the shot and missing

from the other angle/camera.

He, of all people should know about camera

angles since his dad is Oliver Stone and shouldn't

have even brought up the question in the

first place.

At least, that's what one would assume,

anyway.

So, the fact that Juan let that "theory"

float is an indicator, for me.

He could've quickly debunked that

particular part of the theory by saying

something like, "Come one, Sean.

Your dad's Oliver Stone. You mean to

tell me you haven't shown those two

clips to him so that he can explain

to you how camera angles and depth

perception works?"

Sure, from the movie, if you can call

The Called that, you can tell Juan's got a lot of

money and has "inside" info, but I've

yet to find clear info on who he is

and how he's become this seemingly

"sought after" authority.

So, still in a holding pattern for me.