Anonymous ID: 66f457 May 2, 2018, 9:03 p.m. No.1281348   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1390 >>1454 >>1462 >>1490

TWO BIG FINDS

Anons, just found out a couple of crazy things.

 

The first is that the European Council on Foreign Relations is owned by Soros, more or less. Take a look at who funds it: Soros' OSF provided about 8.5x as much as the next highest contributor for both listed years!

https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/european_council_on_foreign_relations_ecfr_0/

 

Additionally, I've come across pretty solid evidence that Soros owns the ICC as well, though some research is needed. I found the pic related about "advocating" from the Soros Leaks, "President's Office" folder:

"-2015 materials from presidential portfolio reviews documents for internal use only -africa regional office international justice november 25 2015-afro international justice portfolio elements 11.2015.doc"

 

Elsewhere in the leaks, they make it plain that "advocating" really means "lobbying". So I did some searching, and found this article from '08:

http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080715soros_owns_icc.html

 

It didn't look like much, so I started corroborating evidence…and it's there. Although Soros doesn't directly fund them through his Open Society Foundations as much anymore, you can find his influence everywhere. For instance, Princess Mabel was on the steering committee for their 2016 financial statement. If you look at who funds the Coalition for the International Court (the ones who fund the International Criminal Court), you see that the World Federalist Movement gave them $2,088,570 in 2013…and the Open Society Foundation is one of the groups that give them money.

 

So what's the big deal? Back when I was researching the $1.7 Billion in cash Obama gave to Iran, I read that the ICC (International Criminal Court, in the Hague) was the one that made the ruling that (he said) justified giving them secret cash. Actually, I later realized it was the IUSCT (Iran–United States Claims Tribunal), but they're associated–they're both part of the Hague, close enough that even some of the newspapers got it wrong.

 

Could it be that Obama justified giving Iran $1.7 Billion based on a decision made by a court that's funded by Soros?

 

We need one last bit of evidence to prove that: we need to figure out whether George Soros funds the IUSCT. The '08 article states that he funded one of the tribunals. Who funds the Iran-US one? If we can figure that out, and if it turns out to be connected to George Soros, it will be YUGE! I can't find a single mention of an article that makes the IUSCT-Soros connection–not one conspiracy theory blog, nothing. So either it isn't there, google is surpressing it, or it's there and nobody knows :)

 

Here's a good, balanced look at that $1.7 Billion ruling, with some background on the IUSCT:

https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1206&context=arbitrationlawreview

 

Here's a link to the Hague's page, showing the relationship between the ICC

and IUSCT:

http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/index.php?id=53

 

And here's an overview of the entire situation, which discusses how much

bullshit it is that the ICC would be recognized at all, given that it's

largely the creation of globalist oligarchs:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1494-the-iccs-philanthropists-the-usual-suspects

Anonymous ID: 66f457 May 2, 2018, 9:17 p.m. No.1281577   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1603

Anybody point this out yet? Overheard a story on Fox, didn't recognize the anchor…but it involved him asking American officials if they would feel safe using a Chinese phone. Nobody raised their hand.

Anonymous ID: 66f457 May 2, 2018, 9:22 p.m. No.1281669   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1281603

Maybe…thought crossed my mind as well. Also, Panasonic Avionics Corporation just got hit with a huge fine for bribery & foreign corruption–check out justice.gov news articles from 4/30/18. They were installing inflight entertainment units…tangled web we have, lots of possibilities.