>I do agree, but, there will be a line in the sand
The shills are the ones telling us violence is never a viable option, when a quick look at history tells you that generally violence isTHE ONLYoption.
NOTABLE
>You think history is the truth?
>
>you need to go back
>
>No violence. Period
>
>Knowledge, Wisdom Courage and Open Insubordination.
Shill.
>LOOK IT OVER ANONS NO FUCKERY
Such a faggot. No one is ever coming to your gay board Gerbil.
>Incorrect. Pay attention. What PDJT is doing is quite brilliant. Violence is on the spectrum of oppression, and oppression is the opposite of freedom.
Yea, thats why so many past revolutions have come without violence. We actually won our independence through hunger strikes, I totally forgot.
>There it is, Let it all out.
You are the problem in this country, content to sit on the sideline wait for a participation trophy while someone else fixes it for. The problem is no one is coming to fix it, until you realize that it will never get fixed.
Violence is the pillar on which all societies are built and its repression is tantamount to societal collapse.
For societies to function, there must be a set of agreed upon rules, which we call laws, to govern all individuals which comprise them. Without those rules to abide by, individuals would likely work against each other and societies would collapse. Even assuming the good will of the individuals comprising a society, having laws allows us to determine the point at which a dysfunctional individual must be stopped by force.
Of course, laws are simply words. Spoken words or words on paper, but only words. Laws gain power through their enforcement, and enforcement is only possible through violence or the implied threat of violence. As an example, a man may pay off a speeding ticket because he thinks it’s the right thing to do, but what stops him from deciding he doesn’t feel like paying it is the threat of being forcefully taken to jail. And once in jail, what keeps him behaved is the threat of further confinement, which is achieved through violence. Thus, without violence, laws cannot be enforced. If laws cannot be enforced, the laws mean nothing. If the laws mean nothing, then nothing stops individuals from acting against the well-being of that society. And if nothing stops individuals from acting against the well being of society, then the society will eventually collapse. It will take longer in societies where individuals are responsible, but it will happen eventually. What keeps the predatory, the sociopathic, from gaining full power over individuals aiming to make society function, is the threat of violence against them.
Thus, the notion that “violence is never the answer” is a laughable one.We teach(or rather, our governments teach)our children that violence is wrong, that they must never use it no matter what. The aim of this is to create a society of slaves who will never protect themselves when abused.
It is slave morality and we must emancipate ourselves from it. Yes, violence is acceptable, in certain conditions. It may not be desirable, but it becomes acceptable – nay, necessary – if one hopes to have a complex and functional society. Otherwise, what you have is merely a parody of a society, a human organization which does not work for the good and improvement of humanity, but for the glory of its sociopathic leaders. This, in essence, is the reason behind the west’s continued descent into decadence. If the decent, righteous folks who constitute the majority of mankind refuse to engage in violence, then dysfunctional individuals won’t hesitate to take what they want by force. Over time, this will allow them to gain positions of power where they will weaken the laws even further and allow even more dysfunctionals into positions of power until we reach a point where the common folk are dominated by a handful of psychopaths, refusing to defend themselves as they believe violence is wrong while letting violence be used to dominate them.
Once such a point is reached, the less intelligent brutes will begin using violence not because they want freedom from the dominating castes, but merely because no one is stopping them. The decent folk refuse to use violence to stop them while those in charge don’t care. Worse, those in charge now hesitate to use violence to stop the brutes because it might set a precedent, teach the decent folks that violence is indeed the answer. This is how we wind up with riots all over the place and eventually, either when someone sees an opportunity to seize power or the decent folks finally have enough, civil war. Once the civil war blows over, people with power and the will to enforce laws will create their new state, with new laws, but none can tell if these laws will be the kind which allow a civilized society.
In conclusion, it is my belief that to prevent a total societal failure of the west, it is imperative to teach violence to people again. Teach them how to do it, when to do it, why they should do it.
Remember that it is not a prayer which will keep the darkness at bay, but a sword.
>You're Wong on so many Levels.
>
>Anyone that listens to you is a fool.
>
>Let it all out
Ad hominem attacks are the calling card of shills. You display them perfectly, enjoy your government paychecks while they last.
>Again, none of the shit they are trying to attribute to me is actually me. Wonder why they are all so invested in destroying my reputation.
But I am essentially free from my IRL work duties now and if anons are sick of the Doodle/Gerbil/Comms/MNR kayfabe faggotry just let me know and I'll take the bake from them.
>Chasing the bottom, call out notables and good afternoon to all
JonDoodle is always chasing the bottoms, cause he's a faggot.
This post the faggot is responding to is me for once.
Yes, anons are fully aware that you have complete dedication to trying to fuck up the board and aggravate anons while simultaneously trying to attribute the gay shit you pull on me. It's almost comical at this point, I don't have to repond because you have failed in your mission so completely. Please continue Jon Doodle.
>'''I WILL NOT SPLIT THE BREAD. JUST LIKE I REFUSE TO SPLIT THE BREAD ALL DAY LONG. LET THESE FAGGOTS BAKE
The entire psyop you are trying to run at the moment is to consensus crack the idea that it is never ok to take the bake away from shit bakers, because you and your team are the shit bakers. You are failing.
>Why do you sometimes refer to yourself as John Doodle and other times as Gerbil or Grvl?
Because they are all the same faggot. All they all come from the same place and have the same goal.
>we'll see what happens
What is happening is what always happens, one /MNR/ faggot gets the bake, the other /MNR/ faggots run interference. c34f11 - 17 posts all either taking about the bake or trying to blame me for their own faggotry.
Nope, that's JonDoodle/Gerbil persona
>Got it.you baking or am I going to have ta…
I'm getting ready to shut down my PC and add a few SSDs, I can't bake for a bit.
>here anons have some data points. the shills are terrified of an anon in the kitchen. its because they use their shitty notables to keep the hive mind docile, and not disseminating information at a time when people are looking for answers. they think you are so stupid that you wont notice, or do anything about it.
Anon just like us, sure Jon.