>>12811546 (pb)
Since the Anon did not post the actual PDF of the DIck Act 1902 I thought I would do so as I have a copy of it sent direct from the University if Minnesota which I paid $20 for.
I get really annoyed with people posting about the Dick Act without actually providing the PDF or forcing people to go to some obscure website where they have to contend with crappy ads and obscure links and poorly written articles.