>>12815234 pb

145-61, eh?

The Cheney vote may have been done in secret, but I think I have a good litmus test for determining the sellouts: the results of the resolution to condemn Q last year.

Republican Tally:

YAY - 146

NAY - 17 (praise KEK)

Present - 1

Not Voting - 34

146 checks out with 145, give or take a few names, whoever left, etc. Then assuming the Present and Not Voting are included in with the NAYS, and the majority of the 10 or so new reps are normal (I know, some are jerks already), 17+1+34+10=62. There's your 61-ish. Not a perfect metric, but logical considering hatred of Q+ goes hand-in-hand with hatred of anons.

Roll Call 218 | Bill Number: H. Res. 1154

Oct 02, 2020, 12:31 PM | 116th Congress, 2nd Session

Condemning QAnon and rejecting the conspiracy theories it promotes

>https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2020218?RollCallNum=218&BillNum=1154

>>12816001 lb

>Be McCarthy

>Say Q-on

>"I don’t know if I said it right"

But you sure as fuck voted to condemn it last year, didn't you? Pic related.

>>12816307

While I agree the deeply-entrenched are moar entrenched than anybody had hoped, I can't believe the military would wait on the normiest of normie dumbfucks to wake up organically. How many years would that take to play out? Do we realistically have that time to spare? I hab feeling it's moar "rogue nukes are still floating around somewhere" type shit that's maybe delayed them. Which is not a consolation, but bad feelz shouldn't be the primary driving factor when the country is at stake, should they?

>>12816421

>>12816435

The "attack your enemy" tactic applies to both scenarios, though. They probably wouldn't want to cull a group they're not afraid of in the first place, would they? At least, not at first.

>>12816561

>>12816566

>>12816611

Good point. It's probably moar copium on my part because it would kill me that we're waiting on the fucking normies as usual. At least let it be something wicked cool like a stand-off between Lucifer and Michael over something kick-ass in Antarctica.

>>12816615

It's just a matter of how desperate these fools are, but the optics would be terrible. They haven't tried a full-scale invasion so far for that reason, had to resort to commie subterfuge for how long now, so maybe not.

>>12816628

Maybe Joe or his boy made a deal, after all kek.

>>12816744

High IQ post.

>>12816753

Your post and tone implies projection.