>>12815802 (PB)
>Putin's sham conviction of opposition leader Alexey Navalny must not stand.
Anon, explain to me like I'm a dumb retard why the Navalny conviction is not a sham and why a senator calling it a sham makes them a Soros puppet?
>Putin believes in himself and nothing else.
Yes but if anything that only strengthens the argument that the trial was a sham.
>In my opinion it's just not our business…
Anon who posted it said:
>I guess add Senator Hagerty to the list of Soros puppets
and I am not sure why. Did I miss something?