I question why he is doing this. I read part one and found flaws in his story:
Byrne stated in Part 1 that the press conference when Rudy had the hair dye incident was on a MONDAY. WRONG. It was on a Thursday - because I know where I was when I saw the press conference on the news and I know what DAY it was.
So - based on how he lead up to that press conference with Rudy drinking heavily the night before - I question EVERYTHING he is stating. He doesn't really cast anyone in good light. How is this patriotism? Does it lift anyone up? What purpose does it serve but to cause doubt and make the reader feel bad. I refuse to read the other's because I don't have time to read something that "may or may not be accurate".