>>12825578 (pb)

>"Will we allow the media which is just as guilty as Qanon of presenting truth and lies to divide us."

That is the accurate line. @10:00

>>12825644 (pb)

>she said "Qanon is just as guilty as the media of presenting lies to divide us."

That is NOT accurate.

Parse it: Will we allow the media… to divide us?

The modifying clause says correctly that the media is "just as guilty" as Qanon of presenting truth and lies. (disinfo necessary…)

Nothing she says implies that Q sought to divide us.

>>12826000

>False flag doesn't equal fake. False flag means the reason behind the event is different than the narrative.

Exactly. And that suggests she knew EXACTLY why she said it like this: "I believe that 9/11 happened."

Of course it happened! The real questions are whodunnit and exactly how…

>>12825808

Just watched this again, and it wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing was vetted by Q team.

1) she doesn't recant anything

2) she doesn't blame Q for anything (she CORRECTLY implies that Q is dangerous)

3) she "regrets" saying some things, but never says what, and if you listen very carefully, it seems she is insinuating that the MSM is at fault (not the obvious reading, but a viable one if you consider that this speech may have been very carefully constructed)