Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 3:48 a.m. No.12829038   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9044

>>12829032

what a load of crap.

if the powerful didn't make it impossible a lot more people would have boats and yachts.

but the price is made too expensive through regulations and price gouging.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:07 a.m. No.12829097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

anon posted Q post from May 31, 2020

I wrote the following about July 1, 2020 here, a day on which a new batch of shills tried to claim the board all as their own.

>12829074

one month after that is when a new group showed up here as a shill/baker team and started telling everyone to leave, and then would haze everyone mercilessly , as pester shills in a tag team of IP hopping to try and get the 'regulars' to stop posting here.

after a while they gave up on the persistent people but they tried to make it seem as if they were somehow supposed to be here.

they were very very obvious to long term lurkers.

same type who say 'do not reply to shills' and then scold others for questioning the rancid assumptions in the constant barrage of nonsense-shills.

 

by September about 1/2 the posts would be a fake punch-n-Judy show between new-name-fag names (a one man play, all the roles were the same person. It still runs from time to time.)

 

and still they would badger anyone who would respond and refute the nonsense that dripped in constantly from shills to say 'no, stop this. you are inorganic. all that you say is a fake banter'.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:16 a.m. No.12829138   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9149

>>12829127

I watched an online gamer playing Civ IV and his banter was of the sort of the dengenerate anon who says a city is 'expendible'

if you are in a video game, you might talk like that.

anyone outside of a known context using that kind of banter, especially in a public channel, is way off the moral compass.

thus I say: yet again someone to make the folks who use this board seem jaded, callow, and hypnotized.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:19 a.m. No.12829165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9175

>>12829149

this is akin to the way it was on July 1.

new assholes showed up and did this kind of badger insult shilling, and posting wickedness that they direct at themselves(as such things always go back to the one who sends them).

so this shill is just demonstrating my point in my other post.

it's mentioning how many posts I have and that's really no issue at all.

it pretends to be a gatekeeper and acts like a bully, it's a badger shill.

It will persist through the bread (

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:20 a.m. No.12829177   🗄️.is 🔗kun

the shills do not like observational anti-shill: that is a description of what they are doing in real time, which often can be incorrect, but it directs them towards the descriper posts (because they can't help pretending that they are legitimate) and it ruins their effectiveness (one hopes).

 

but you don't want to teach their methods so . . .

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:26 a.m. No.12829198   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9211 >>9225

>>12829189

any long term lurker knows in this type of transaction that the one who says 'eat . . . .' or other horrible things, that you wouldn't say to someone for real without a kurffuffle, . . .

(what does everyone know?)

 

if everyone does know it then why say it?

 

the point: real anon don't act like total bitches to each other. they might start out with an obvious insult, but they dont' go for the juggular.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:36 a.m. No.12829233   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9240 >>9242

>>12829211

you give a fair explanation.

real people don't need to explain themselves if they have a demon at the other end, they know what they are doing.

so thus you must understand that some are angry about what they have to face as they merely go about their day.

so not everyone who insults another here is a shill.

and in the case of the poster: he's not in the mood for what the shill was doing, so he made a direct statement.

and when I was incorrect (as I said I sometimes am in this effort) he says 'back off, you're wrong, this person deserved it'

and I have to say 'you seem correct, you met it with back-atchas that were inline with what it was doing.'

and then were resepct ful to me when I 'observed'.

 

the point: we see each other as people. We understand that we are under emotins.

we make our observations not to harm but to educate.

the shill, though, doesn't do that.

they are always horible and want to cause alarm.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 4:45 a.m. No.12829257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9356

>>12829175

the 'we see you' bit.

and calling me a 'newfag'.

if it 'sees' me then it sees me everyday and knows me.

and knows if I am or am not what it says I am.

but it doesn't know. It just says it knows.

 

all in all this is often here with this kind of bitch-scold.

they pretend that they are monitoring the board and are from a group that would harm the posters here.

but the real people tasked with that aren't looking for 'keyboard bravado'.

 

shill fail.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 5:45 a.m. No.12829540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9549

>>12829529

it makes up stuff

and when it isn't true it still uses that narrative.

even if proven false: the narrative will still be used.

it's the slander tactic.

 

no one cares about it's meanness.

all it is doing is revealing what it is.

some might be put off oby this kind of thing.

but it will persist anyway, even when confronted with a person who knows what it is and why it does this: it's an intimidation tactic.

 

hard shill fail

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 5:48 a.m. No.12829559   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9567 >>9587

>>12829549

it's has to name call because?

never really can ascertain why.

and as stated, even when what it says is false, and clearly just made up, it persists with the false narative.

it persists with the slander in an inauthentic way.

it is most likely a script-assited shill 'gatekeeper' type process.

 

transparent, false, and not friendly: like democrats?

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 5:53 a.m. No.12829588   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9597

>>12829577

even after clearly it's jsut lost the encounter, and no one takes what it says seriously, it will degenerate to crotch talk from it's slur talk.

by the end of the bread it might even confess to it's script-ness and start doing the 'alice needs mummy' bit that they sometimes do.

Anonymous ID: 2eb726 Feb. 5, 2021, 5:58 a.m. No.12829630   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9640

>>12829616

it has to keep telling others who or what they are.

it has no self control. it will never see equality between anon, it has to always assert a false-dom bit.

the slaver is the slave, always.

shill fail

wait . . . no

shill flail!

flail on floppy!