They broke the water tension,
now the flood.
>THIS IS NOT A CRUSADE !!!
Precisely,
and a good knowledge of history should make that evident why it isn't.
Crusades were Satanic.
As for "Christian",
the use of Scripture verses by Q was sure to steer many into the view it is a Christian movement.
There is no way such a psyop would not know this.
The majority of Trump backers are Christian or claimed Christian.
The use of Scripture was sure to propel the movement by leaps and bounds,
and it did.
Of course,
should that movement fail,
it will have immense consequences against Christians,
perhaps leading to the third Woe.
No worries,
Christ returns during the Woe.
You are right religion is such,
however,
that is due to Man himself,
because though he is by nature at enmity against the true God in his mind,
he cannot help but be religious.
He therefore makes up his own,
being Satanically inspired instead of being inspired by the one,
true God,
including ones claiming to be Christian when they are really not.
Perhaps a good reading of history will reveal Crusades were not just against Muslims.
They were also against non-Catholic Christians,
and against Catholics who tried to help them.
Which is precisely why the Papacy destroyed whole cities of non-Catholic Christians:
Because the Papacy is against Christ and not for Him,
even while pretending to be His friend,
like Judas,
the first Son of Perdition.
>if you actually read the Bible.
The Scriptures I read prophesied the Dragon would make war with the Bride of Christ,
and the Dragon is Satan.
Furthermore,
2 Thessalonians 2 specifically states that because apostates love not the Truth,
God would release them to believe a lie.
That lie is a Satanic inspiration.
Therefore,
though it is true God released them to Satan,
their inspiration came from Satan.
They murdered and destroyed,
and Satan has been a murderer from the beginning.
God's Word is found in the Scriptures,
as taught by the Prophets and the Apostles whom He called to record it.
Seeking by a familiar spirit is anathema to God.
Christ Jesus taught to pray to the Father,
who is in Heaven.
'The meaning of "to pray" is "to ask".
Asking (praying to) any other entity in Heaven to intercede is disobeying Christ,
and opening one to demonic activity.
(NOTE: Though angels were sent from Heaven by God to speak to men,
NONE of those Saints anywhere in Scripture INVOKED them.)
The claim would be this is not praying to "her".
Why the "Amen"?
There is not even one instance in Scripture where any other being in heaven was invoked by godly folk.
They knew they were only to seek God for spiritual aid and mercy.
And this is not the same as asking someone on earth to pray for you.
Praying to any other entity in heaven is not the same as asking someone on earth to pray.
This is because when Christ taught prayers directed toward Heaven,
are to be prayed to the Father.
His teaching nothing to do with asking those on earth to pray for you.
To seek outside of the Doctrine of the Prophets and the Apostles,
which they recorded faithfully under the inspiration of its Author,
would not be "truth".
Belittling it as merely a "book",
rather than what that book contains,
is a ploy for those wishing to follow laws God did not give,
or to follow those He disallowed.
The word "god" also means "judge".
So though all men are judges,
they are not divine beings.
The entire vision given John was metaphorical,
the interpretation of which is to be found in the preceding books of the Scriptures.
One example is that found in Jude where he describes apostates as "fallen stars".
And in Rev. 12,
that is not "the Virgin".
It is Israel.
Neither are astronomical signs,
but metaphors the interpretation of which will be found in the entirety of the Scriptures.
God provided that Middle Man:
He is Christ Jesus,
who is also God the Word.
God the Word is the Middle Man.
The context of those verses is referring to the Laws of Moses.
Ancient earthly Israel had those Laws as its laws,
but they added to those laws.
Therefore,
when the judged unjustly,
it was according to the laws they made up and that God had never given Moses.
Those are the traditions which Jesus Christ decried and condemned,
because they were not of His Father,
not His Word,
but that of the Devil.
Actually,
Paul himself warned there would be a great falling away.
That's the shift.
However,
the Old Testament was the old dispensation under the Law until the time when Christ,
of which the Old Testament spoke and foretold;
while the New Testament is that which Christ fulfilled according to that which was foretold.
So they are harmonious and not contradicting.
And that would be God,
the Father and His Word given by one Spirit.
That is the Triunity who is the one God.
>"God" did not tell him to kill.
That is not true.
The Isaelites had agreed to the Covenant with God,
which were Laws.
Those Laws were their national Laws and they had consequences.
When they disobeyed the simple Decalogue He had spoken personally to them (not through Moses),
they immediately set out to transgress it.
The punishment was death.
Moses was merely carrying out the punishment.
Moses was banned because he had not given God the glory,
but took it upon himself,
disobeying His command to speak to the rock.
Moses instead struck the rock.
This was the second time water was given from a rock,
but only the first time was that rock to be struck.
This was a sign given Israel that the Messiah was to be struck,
ONE TIME,
since all men are to die once,
and then the judgment.
By Moses having struck the rock the second time,
he had given the people the understanding the rock was to be struck perpetually.
But it is not true Moses didn't recognize his sin.
You made that part up.
Moses repented,
but he had to reap what he had sown.