>>12830105 (last notable)

so I don't think this is notable. I've tried to look up a few of those names and found nothing. If someone finds a missing person matching one of those names I'll be surprised, but here... if you want something notable and FACTUAL about adrenochrome...

How about you tell me if it's mathematically possible for a "scientist" or group of "scientists" to go from total happenstance speculation of a substance responsible for schizophrenic hallucianations to identification of the substance and mechanism, confirmation of it's psychomimetic/hallucinagenic effects, clinical objective verification of it's impact on the brain (via EEG) to pee-pee tape fun facts from Aldous Huxley about how one can get in on the fun simply by drinking the urine of someone else who consumed a hallucinagen... wait for it...

ALL IN A PERIOD OF 18 MONTHS

PROBLEM REACTION SOLUTION at its finest.

They expect us to believe they sat around and realized a new way of thinking about Schizophrenia was needed, they thought experimented their way to realizing there could be a chemical that was causing this, speculated about what chemicals it could be, took that speculation to a bunch of 33rd degree freemasons, found the chemical, tried it out themselves, tested it's effects on others, and BOOM- unlocked the secret knowlege of how stress converts Adrenaline to Adrenochrome in the brains of psychologically traumatized folks.... in record time.

They don't want us to think that they already knew this because they were in the club and had a bountiful supply of traumatized victims they could whatever the fuck they wanted to with when they were done doing whatever the fuck they wanted to with.

>>12831033

>>12831063

All of the factual statements are sauced in the original post, as, except for the part about the first paper first being presented to the Committee for Dimentia Praecox of the New York Scottish Rite (33) (screen capped in the first post), it's all straight from the 2 papers.

I do have additional sauce for my concerns.

I don't think people realize just how much interest (((they))) had in early childhood trauma. Today, even the notion that what we know to be schizophrenia could occur in childhood has been memory holed. We're told that it only happens in young adults and is something completely different from DID, which does happen to early childhood trauma victims, but "doctors don't even think that's a real thing", we're told.

Fact is they knew damn well this happened to kids.

Here is a video showing the differences aren't anywhere near as cut and dry as they want us to think…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET0LYLAuxjc

And here are some screen caps from some of (((their))) early involvement and showing kids were, in fact, a focus of their money and attention.

Finally, I added a grab of a magazine of (((theirs))) from the early 80s I think, where they boast about it.