Anonymous ID: 1b0abe Feb. 5, 2021, 3:38 p.m. No.12834500   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4523 >>4600 >>4689 >>4769

Regarding the Lyndell video: by all means, share it with normies, but there's nothing new for us.

 

The "100% proof" starting around 1:36 is actually taken from Patrick Byrne's team, and the data can be found in this write-up:

 

https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/01/how-djt-lost-the-white-house-chapter-2-was-there-foreign-interference-in-this-election-you-make-the-call/

 

Download the excel sheet in the third paragraph.

 

What I would like to know is if mac and IP spoofing has been ruled out.

Some of the listed "owners" sure as hell did not participate, unless their computers were hijacked.

I just randomly looked at some names that seemed odd, and found a small German manufacturer of bathroom fittings, for example. Taking into account the time difference, they would have had to run the attack during their regular working hours (9-ish in the morning), which makes even less sense.

Anonymous ID: 1b0abe Feb. 5, 2021, 3:56 p.m. No.12834689   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12834500

Also a bunch of universities that are unlinkely players, and if they have staff that are responsible they should be identified easily.

(I am talking outside of China, of course).

 

Furthermore, there are a bunch of "players" that are really only place names.

Anonymous ID: 1b0abe Feb. 5, 2021, 4:23 p.m. No.12834967   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12834769

No, it is not. Nothing to do with "creating doubt", but wondering how reliable the data is.

The Lindell documentary is getting hyped, with this part being "100% proof".

Just imagine what happens if the "proof" turns out to be flawed?

My question stands: what is the reason for unlikely players being listed in the excel sheets ? IP spoofing ? Infected IT systems ? I don't have the tech background to check this, but maybe someone around here does.