when? when will you stand up for 'democratic values?'
you sit there as an officer in a government that is vittiated by the fraud of election stealing.
name fag bakers are a corruption to the principles expressed here usually.
you are a fraud, and a gatekeeper shill.
the gate keeper pretends to be in charge.
this is a place for free speech.
your assumptions about who is here are bogus.
the model you use for president is one of 'despot'
that is an incorrect model.
when the election is a fraud the 'president' is not seen as a leader by most of the people.
not the leader, nor is he 'beloved'.
what you do is called propaganda.
and in wartime . . . that's rather questionable behavior.
do you realize it's a different ID than the baker?
that is one of the reasons that namefagging is discouraged: because anyone can use the name.
it makes it very confusing.
I always comment on posts and talk about shills int he third person. It's one of the things I do here.
thank you for noticing.
I also notice that you devolve into a shill scold.
sad for you to think that it's our place to accept people who are 'forgiven' without having them learn or grow or change their ways?
We are supposed to love them no matter what, so your little prayer, fake as it is, wasn't even needed, we already know this stuff.
'forgiveness' isn't ours to give to them if they were doing bad stuff to others.
there is a necessary growth that they must do.
and our accepting them means nothing.
Who is it hat needs to accept them, anon?
it's not us.
you pretend to know Him, but you don't.
you're just creating a narrative of confusion with your fake prayer. you seek to farm the idea that 'oh, well they are forgiven, and thus . . . '
the real prayer to make in this case:
pray that idiot shills stop mocking real holy people.,
pray that shills don't mangle the idea of forgiveness and suggest that bad behavior of others will magically disapper
pray that shills understand that it doesn't matter what we think or who we accept.
we don't get to say if thy are good or bad.
you miss that fundimental point and thus show your total falsity.
a mocker you show and incongruent picture.
that's not what I do and that is not what I think
if they aren't a shill and I comment then they comment back and we have a small encounter.
why do you need people to use your statements as statements of belief?
is there some damaged part of you that makes you want to control other people's narratives?
let me answer: yes, you are a damaged person and you farm a poison narrative.
discuss.
today the 'it's over' shills, who were here on infogaration day, are in force with a 'you must agree with our premise.'
what is damaged in your mind that you have to come here and bitch-scold otehrs about statements of such necessary false concoction?
what purpose to demand that others use your false assumptions and fake narrative?
the reason: it's part of a larger scheme that they devise to further (they imagine) humiliate the target audience (which they must call 'the qaon' or other concise word)
their narrative: we were betrayed by the evil forces of the people who used us
other narratives: many people lurk here to catch the news.
they can't have the 'anon are just random people and there is no plan or qanon' because it destroys their narrative.