Anonymous ID: 3d3b94 Feb. 6, 2021, 7:59 p.m. No.12845997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6032 >>6061 >>6082 >>6096 >>6157 >>6212 >>6300 >>6569 >>6575 >>6624 >>6691

That Didn’t Take Long: US Borders Wide Open – Fake Asylum Seekers Walk Across Border and Are Immediately Released

 

The Gates Are Open–

It took Joe Biden two weeks to open up the flow of unlimited numbers of migrants into the United States.

 

Fake asylum seekers are starting to pour across the US southern border again. The migrants are released almost immediately into the US to live the “American dream.”

 

Patriot Fire published this subtitled Univision news report that aired this week.

 

The word is out. The US border is open once again!

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/didnt-take-long-us-borders-wide-open-fake-asylum-seekers-walk-across-border-immediately-released-video/

Anonymous ID: 3d3b94 Feb. 6, 2021, 8:03 p.m. No.12846019   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6061 >>6140 >>6182 >>6212 >>6300 >>6367 >>6569 >>6624 >>6691

Assange sex abuse accuser steps out of the shadows and into controversy

 

Malmo: Julian Assange’s accuser has come under fire in Sweden after she went public for the first time with a tell-all book centred around her allegations of sexual abuse.

Anna Ardin

 

Anna Ardin

 

Anna Ardin, previously known as just “Miss A”, stepped into the limelight to release a book, In the Shadow of Assange: My Testimony, and has since appeared on Swedish television’s top chat show, been the subject of a two-part documentary, and been interviewed in every major Swedish newspaper.

 

But the sudden sweep of publicity has triggered controversy.

 

After Ardin’s main TV appearance, Anne Ramberg, the former head of Sweden’s bar association, wrote that the interview with “the aggrieved lady who provided her home and bed to Assange”, was “extremely worrying”.

 

“Anyone who has not read the preliminary investigation should do so,” she tweeted. “To now write a book and make a career of what is described as abuse seems extremely questionable.”

 

“Regarding Assange,” she continued in another tweet. “He has denied the allegations and should be considered innocent.”

 

In her book, Ardin argues that she is pushing back at the information campaign against her “that Julian has been active in and which I have over the past 10 years done everything I could to avoid”.

 

“We are never going to get to know whether Julian is a perpetrator in a juridical sense, but I can describe the events as I experienced them,” she writes. “Instead of standing witness in the trial which never happened, I now want to give my version.”

 

The book adds detail to the accusations that led prosecutors to arrest WikiLeaks founder Assange in absentia on charges of unlawful coercion and sexual harassment: that he held her down roughly after they agreed to have consensual sex and then deliberately sabotaged a condom so he could ejaculate into her.

 

She describes how, when she first meets him in her flat, Assange greets her holding one of her bras. “I’ve been looking through your drawer,” he says. “I saw the size of this and thought, ‘This is a woman I’d like to meet.’”

 

She describes how in the days he stays in the flat, he never showers, so by the last day, it “smells strongly of unwashed body, of dried-in sweat, and there are t—s floating in the toilet”.

 

Part of what makes Ardin’s account interesting is that she includes new details that give ammunition to her doubters. She was already considering sleeping with Assange even before he made a clumsy pass, she says, partly because of his celebrity and partly to irritate her ex.

 

“It might be a pretty fun thing, and no big deal to ‘score with Julian Assange’,” she remembers thinking.

 

She describes how she willingly got up, fetched a condom and returned to join Assange in bed, putting the decision down to “the coolness in his gaze, our common knowledge that he is stronger than me”, and her wish not to make a scene. After she manages to relax, she goes on to have “one orgasm, perhaps even two”.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/assange-sex-abuse-accuser-steps-out-of-the-shadows-and-into-controversy-with-book-20210207-p57096.html

Anonymous ID: 3d3b94 Feb. 6, 2021, 8:12 p.m. No.12846071   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6212 >>6300 >>6569 >>6624 >>6691

Secretive international banking group may enforce Great Reset ‘green’ agenda on world

 

Adherence, or not, to green policies, could determine whether an individual or a business is allowed access to finances.

 

The U.S. Federal Reserve has recently joined a little-known international conglomerate of central banks, all fundamentally committed to enforcing the “green,” eco-friendly dictates of the anti-life, global governance Paris agreement, in line with the Great Reset.

 

Such a move has raised alarming concerns about the influence which banks will exert in enforcing green policies as part of the World Economic Forum’s so-called Great Reset. For instance, one of the goals of this all-powerful, world-banking conglomerate appears to be to decimate the entire fossil fuel industry and the many thousands of industries and millions of jobs related to it.

 

In September, LifeSiteNews co-founder Steve Jalsevac warned that COVID-19 is being used as a means to implement extreme, globalist policies to promote the green agenda. He noted the “shocking climate change connection to the Wuhan virus mitigation policies and that it is really about implementing the extreme Paris Climate Change Accord policies and UN Sustainable Development goals, the ‘Great Reset,’ and world depopulation goals.”

 

“Lockdowns have led to massive, man-made carbon dioxide and pollution drops. The globalists are forcing people to see what the world would look like if there were fewer people in the world, as though we will all be positively impressed with empty streets and highways, no cruise liners on the seas, and few aircraft in the skies. It is downright evil.”

 

In December 2020, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board announced that it had joined the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), which is an international group of “Central Banks and supervisors” with the purpose of transforming the global economy in alignment with green, sustainable policies.

 

Noting the move, the New York Times wrote that it was a welcome success for Democrats, who had been pushing for this, and described it as an “evolution” for the Federal Reserve in terms of paying much closer, and more public attention to “extreme weather events” and their potential “risk to the financial system.”

 

Reporting on the news, Breitbart observed how it was peculiar that the left, particularly the green movement, had greeted the Federal Reserve’s move with “applause,” given that historically the left had been “mostly hostile to big financial institutions, seeing them as pillars of Capital.”

The NGFS and its commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement

 

The almost unknown NGFS was born at the Paris “One Planet Summit” in December 2017, with the aim of: “strengthening the global response required to meet the goals of the Paris agreement and to enhance the role of the financial system to manage risks and to mobilize capital for green and low-carbon investments in the broader context of environmentally sustainable development.”

 

Its focus is the role which “climate change” will have upon the economy, the financial system, and banking.

 

However, the group is not limited to forming policies for internal discussion, but also seeks to implement them outside its members. “The Network defines and promotes best practices to be implemented within and outside of the Membership of the NGFS and conducts or commissions analytical work on green finance.”

 

Lockdowns held as a benefit for the world in Great Reset

 

In understanding the primacy of the green agenda and green finance in the Great Reset, it is important to note the manner in which Schwab has welcomed the various restrictions seen in the last year, as a benefit for the planet. As lockdowns shut down countries across the world and decimated economies, Schwab wrote in TIME in October 2020, pointing to the benefit which came as a result of such unprecedented societal disruption: “the drop in greenhouse-gas emissions, which brought slight, temporary relief to the planet’s atmosphere.”

 

However, in his recent book, entitled COVID-19: The Great Reset, Schwab wrote that there was still much progress to be made in terms of reducing “carbon emissions.” The 8% estimated reduction in carbon emission which he cited, was termed “rather disappointing,” and he called for a greater, fundamental change. If such a focus on green polices was not adopted, then “the COVID-19 crisis will have gone to waste as far as climate policies are concerned.”

 

“The COVID-19 crisis cannot go to waste and that now is the time to enact sustainable environmental policies,” Schwab declared. “The climate risk is unfolding more slowly than the pandemic did, but it will have even more severe consequences.”

 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/secretive-international-banking-group-may-enforce-great-reset-green-agenda-on-world?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=standard

Anonymous ID: 3d3b94 Feb. 6, 2021, 8:18 p.m. No.12846110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6212 >>6300 >>6534 >>6569 >>6624 >>6646 >>6691

Nevada Bill Would Bring Back the 'Company Town' With a Big Tech, Big Brother Twist

 

Forget about dismantling the power of Big Tech. If a Nevada bill becomes law in the state, tech companies would be given a jolt of steroids. They would be able to start their own governments, according to KCRA.

 

Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak announced a plan to launch so-called Innovation Zones in Nevada to jumpstart the state’s economy by attracting technology firms, Las Vegas Review-Journal reported Wednesday.

 

The zones would permit companies with large areas of land to form governments carrying the same authority as counties, including the ability to impose taxes, form school districts and courts and provide government services.

 

The measure to further economic development with the “alternative form of local government” has not yet been introduced in the Legislature.

 

Sisolak pitched the concept in his State of the State address delivered Jan. 19.

 

Read the rest to get a sense of the idea’s contours.

 

While Sislak’s proposal focuses on today’s tech companies, it’s far from a new idea. Democrats are usually living in the 20th century, forever hailing back to the 1960s for their folk music and back to the 1930s New Deal (which was a failure) for their branding and centralist economic agendas (such as the Green New Deal, which is actually socialist ideas wrapped in Depression-era branding in green paint). Sislak’s idea is even older than that. It hails from the Industrial Revolution and the Gilded Age.

 

There is a more recent example of a kind of company town. But it’s more of a permit town than a company town. In the 1980s, a friend of Willie Nelson’s by the name of Carl Cornelius owned a truck stop in Hill County, Texas off I-35. He wanted to be able to sell liquor but the county was mostly dry. He incorporated his own town and called it Carl’s Corner. It’s still a town, not a whole lot bigger than the truck stop he owned, which is also still there, decades after he passed on. Willie is of course still going strong.

 

From the 1890s or thereabouts to the first couple of decades past World War II, the “company town” and the “company man” were inextricably a thing. Companies that were mining coal, extending the railroads, building the telegraph, and generally moving America’s borders and cities west or industries forward were able to establish what amounted to jurisdictions and even forms of currency on land they owned. Workers would live their entire lives in the company town, shop at the company store, and were even often paid in scrip, which was company currency. When you took such a job, you “sold your soul to the company store,” as the old song goes.

 

They provided jobs but weren’t necessarily a good or bad thing, according to Smithsonian. It depended to a great extent on the type of work the company did.

 

Towns built by coal companies, for example, were often more on the prison camp end of the spectrum in terms of poverty and abuse. Meanwhile, settlements like Hershey, Pennsylvania, built by the Hershey chocolate company, were meant to be closer to paradise—to woo workers with fancy amenities rather than mistreat them.

 

Second, as Green explains, to speak about company towns in the past tense is to overlook that they still exist. The original coal and textile towns in America are now largely ghostly, but places like Hershey and Corning, New York, which was invigorated by the Corning glass company, are still going strong. Plus, as the LA Times writes, businesses such as Google and Facebook today are providing housing, amenities and transportation for their workers—meaning that while we think of company towns in sepia tones, they’re also in digital blue.

 

The new company towns would likely be blue politically too. It would be a requirement to live and work there. It’s probably no accident that Sislak is contemplating allowing them to be built in what are rural areas today. The political divide in our country is not really between red and blue states. It’s between rural areas, which tend to vote Republican, and urban centers, which tend to vote Democrat. The suburbs are battleground neighborhoods and counties.

 

Company towns mostly went away in the post-war years as the soldiers returned, the baby boom boomed and the suburbs blossomed.

 

Now they’re back, if Sislak’s proposal becomes law in Nevada.

 

Imagine, though, what woke technocrats will do with their newfound territorial powers. Imagine “mayors” or whatever title the local tech government leaders take answering directly to Twitter’s Jack Dorsey. Twitter already acts like it has a foreign policy and it censors all kinds of things including actual news. It could take on a domestic portfolio/personality cult at the local level.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2021/02/06/nevada-bill-would-bring-back-the-company-town-with-a-big-tech-big-brother-twist-n1423698

Anonymous ID: 3d3b94 Feb. 6, 2021, 8:48 p.m. No.12846332   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6569 >>6624 >>6691

Biden To Remove Ansar Allah Terrorist Designation (Map Update)

 

On February 5th, US President Joe Biden’s administration began actions to remove Yemen’s Ansar Allah (the Houthis) terrorist designation.

 

The reason was cited as the necessity to mitigate long-lasting effect of one of the worst humanitarian disasters.

 

President Donald Trump’s administration had branded the Iranian-backed Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization, a move that limited the provision of aid to the Yemeni people, who have suffered under a yearslong civil war and famine.

 

A State Department official confirmed the move, after members of Congress were notified of the administration’s plans.

 

The unnamed official, said the removal changed nothing about the Biden administration’s views of the Houthis, who have targeted civilians and kidnapped Americans.

 

“Our action is due entirely to the humanitarian consequences of this last-minute designation from the prior administration, which the United Nations and humanitarian organizations have since made clear would accelerate the world’s worst humanitarian crisis,” the official said.

 

The move comes a day after Biden announced an end to offensive support to Saudi Arabia’s campaign against the Houthis.

 

The Obama administration in 2015 gave its approval to Saudi Arabia leading a cross-border air campaign targeting Yemen’s Houthi rebels, who were seizing ever more territory, including Sanaa. The Houthis have launched multiple drone and missile strikes deep into Saudi Arabia. The U.S. says the Saudi-led campaign has entrenched Iran’s role in the conflict, on the side of the Houthis.

 

“This war has to end,” Biden told diplomats in his first visit to the State Department as president, saying the conflict had created a “humanitarian and strategic catastrophe.”

 

Saudi Arabia has been conciliatory in its response to rebuffs from Biden, who as a candidate blasted the kingdom’s current rulers for rights abuses and as president has made clear he intends to distance his administration from Saudi leaders.

 

Despite the claims, the Biden administration also said it will help the Kingdom boost its defenses against outside attacks, as part of maintaining key security, counterterrorism and military ties with Saudi Arabia, a strategic partner and global oil giant.

 

“We welcome President Biden’s stated commitment to work with friends and allies to resolve conflicts, and deal with attacks from Iran & its proxies in the region,” Saudi Prince Khalid bin Salman, a son of King Salman and the kingdom’s deputy defense minister, tweeted.

 

So, time will tell if anything will change.

 

The Liaison and Coordination Officers’ Operations Room (loyal to Ansar Allah) reported 148 ceasefire violations in al-Hudaydah during the past 24 hours

On February 5, Saudi-led coalition Apache combat helicopters conducted airstrike on the Kitaf area

On February 5, Saudi-led coalition warplanes conducted airstrike on the Sarwah area

On February 5, Saudi-led coalition warplanes conducted airstrike on the Asir area

9 Ansar Allah members were released in in POWs exchange with Hadi government, according to Abdul Qadir Morteza, Chairman of the Committee for Prisoners of Salvation Government

Khalid al-Batarfi, an al-Qaeda leader in Yemen was arrested in Mahrah province last October, according to UN

 

https://southfront.org/biden-to-remove-ansar-allah-terrorist-designation-map-update/