Trump and Pepe should not be depicted as crusaders of the Papacy.
Insulting.
Lewis was a secret Catholic,
choosing not to officially (publicly) join,
instead working as an operative for the Vatican.
Whatever the case,
neither Trump nor Pepe are Crusaders.
So your accusation of "myopic" is projection,
as is that of "bigot".
It's the Papacy that is a bigot,
having denied for centuries non-Catholic Christians are truly Christian.
Vatican City is trying to clean up its image by playing good cop and bad cop.
Furthermore,
continuing to place the U.S.
(since the mid-1800's when it was dedicated to that familiar spirit)
and the whole world under the "mantle of the Queen of Victories" as the "Unconquered Leader in battle",
of whom it is claimed was immaculately conceived,
is IDOLATRY of the more evil form.
There is no queen of Heaven;
she is not the "unconquered leader in battle",
CHRIST JESUS is;
and she was not immaculately conceived,
but the true Mary was born in sin as any other human born of an earthly father has and is.
Continuing in this idolatry is ACCURSED,
and does not invoke blessings.
This is being purposely done by Vatican City to CURSE the U.S.
Vatican City has been,
and even before it became a principality,
a sworn enemy of the U.S. and all other nations refusing to submit to the Papacy claiming to rule over all nations and kings as well as over all the Body of Christ
(of which the religion of Vatican City is NOT, but is ANTICHRIST).
Flee from that Harlot and her False Prophet!
Crusaders were given indulgence
(free pass from Hell)
to be able to perpetrate all manner of Satanic evil during their "crusade":
rapine
looting
genocide
etc.,
even against non-catholic Christians and Catholics who tried to come to their aid.
Papal legate overseeing a Crusade army who questioned killing Catholics in cities they were besieging:
Kill them all,
God will sort them out.
Jerusalem was not the Harlot of the Revelation.
The city which ruled over kings was not Jerusalem in John's time.
Jerusalem had not been an empire since the days of Solomon.
It was Rome which ruled over Jerusalem in the days of John.
A "great city" was a seat of an empire,
ruling over other kings,
its king a "king of kings".
That is the meaning of "emperor".
It is about wanting to rule the whole world,
which takes money and power.
It is Satanic,
and it didn't just start with Bergoglio.
The papal crusaders were the same sort of witches.
That's why the Papacy issued them indulgences,
even for slaughtering their own Catholics.
The Papacy pushed it to get rid of non-Catholic Christians who were outing it.
They also did the Crusades against the Saracens and Constantinople to gain wealth,
both in looting and in attempting to control the crossroads of the silk road.
The princes on the side of the Papacy were with it,
while those dukes the Crusaders attacked were attempting to keep the non-Catholic Christians safe because they were an extremely industrious people who brought much wealth to their regions.
Actually,
the office of "bishop over all bishops" (pope)
was created by the eastern Roman emperor Justinian I in 536 AD.
The term "pope" or "pappa" maybe came out later.
The term "pope" didn't exist,
but the office did.
It was created in 536 AD by Justinian I.
Look it up.
The Revelation warned about an apostate "Christianity".
That's why she's called a "harlot",
and "mystery Babylon".
But Jerusalem didn't control kings at that time.
Rome did.
Jerusalem was controlled by Rome,
and it was not a "great city",
the meaning of which is "empire seat".