Pedodent Biden only has kamela toe
Absolute evidence of the most massive election fraud from other countries and within the USA, Thousands upon thousands of pages of forensic cybersecurity evidence of election fraud down to the country, IP address, time stamps and the votes stolen from Trump. The largest cybersecurity hack in our nations history 66% from Communist China, Iran and others.
In Arizona:
-Illegal aliens voting 36,400
-Completed mail-in ballots received before ballots mailed out 22,903
-Votes loaded before polls opened 50,000
-Plus thousands upon thousands of other irregularities, illegal procedures, etc
Nevada:
-Illegal Aliens voting 4,000
-Dead people voting 1,506
-Mail-in ballots or absentee ballots from voters who were known
to have voted in other states 15,000
-Voters to have double voted 42,284
-Non Nevadans voting in Nevada 19,218
-Plus thousands upon thousands of other irregularities, illegal procedures, etc
Georgia:
-Underage children voting 66,247
-Felons illegally voting 2,560
–Plus thousands upon thousands of other irregularities, illegal procedures, etc
Pennsylvania:
-Fake Ballots driven from New York to Pennsylvania 100,000
-Plus thousands upon thousands of other irregularities, illegal procedures, etc
Michigan:
-Dead Voters 17,367
-
ABSOLUTE PROOF | MIKE LINDELL https://zb10-7gsop1v78.bitchute.com/IIC6VbV69ioF/WNP5InC3q6Q0.mp4
ABSOLUTE PROOF | MIKE LINDELL https://www.bitchute.com/video/FtRYtna3YYe9/
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
Justices take two oaths or the combined oath, “I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
Call your US REP U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or https://www.house.gov/representative
US SENATORS United States Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
and the Supreme Court Comment line Public Information Office at the following number: 202-479-3211, Reporters press 1. Contact: Contact the Supreme Court of the United States.
Phone Number: 1-202-479-3000. 1-202-479-3030
https://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx
In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no "hate speech" exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker's viewpoint.
Opinion: Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/
Offensive Speech
Supreme Court Affirms Hate Speech Protected
June 21, 2017
https://firstamendmentwatch.org/slants-case-supreme-court-affirms-no-hate-speech-exception/
Justice Samuel Alito wrote that silencing offensive speech is wrong and that “our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate’.”
Matal v. Tam - Harvard Law Review
https://harvardlawreview.org › 2017/11 › matal-v-tam
Nov 10, 2017 — This speech may be hateful, but it is still protected.