https://www.deepcapture.com/
Patrick Byrne's analysis (5 parts + 2 prelims) How DJT Lost the White House: very clever disinfo?
Key background facts:
-
Byrne has a background as an autonomous white hat working with white hats in government. See his essays on "naked short selling":
https://www.deepcapture.com/introduction-to-the-deep-capture-analysis/
-
Byrne has made it clear in the past that he will concoct complicated fabulations if it serves the righteous cause:
https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/10/finale-the-deep-states-hillary-clinton-bribery-blackmail-sting-the-maria-butina-rape-murder-gambit/
At link, Byrne tells how, as part of an effort to get Comey and Brennan indicted for rape and murder, he told federal agents a carefully crafted, but in many ways untrue, story that pointed to the clear conclusion that he had raped Maria Butina. But he hadn't done that.
-
Byrne is very smart. You can ascertain this for yourself by carefully examining his writings in conjunction with known facts about his life.
Now go to the "official" first part of the five-part series:
https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/01/november-3-december-23-all-the-presidents-teams/
See the opening in the graphic. Read closely. What is wrong?
Think it out before reading further. See "answer" at link below…
The paragraph is bullshit.
Moreover, the chance that Patrick Byrne does not know it is bullshit is pretty much zero. (Read some of his other essays.)
Moreover, this is not just any random paragraph, but the overt opening paragraph of the whole series. And insofar as it purports to explain why Byrne will say little about Powell, and much about Rudy, the paragraph is overtly a commentary on the entire series.
And what the paragraph is implicitly saying is that the entire series is mixed with bullshit.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/attorney-client-privilege.html