Anonymous ID: 3c5747 Feb. 8, 2021, 10:20 p.m. No.12866502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6508 >>6576 >>6616 >>6756 >>6885 >>6939

https://www.deepcapture.com/

Patrick Byrne's analysis (5 parts + 2 prelims) How DJT Lost the White House: very clever disinfo?

 

Key background facts:

  • Byrne has a background as an autonomous white hat working with white hats in government. See his essays on "naked short selling":

https://www.deepcapture.com/introduction-to-the-deep-capture-analysis/

  • Byrne has made it clear in the past that he will concoct complicated fabulations if it serves the righteous cause:

https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/10/finale-the-deep-states-hillary-clinton-bribery-blackmail-sting-the-maria-butina-rape-murder-gambit/

At link, Byrne tells how, as part of an effort to get Comey and Brennan indicted for rape and murder, he told federal agents a carefully crafted, but in many ways untrue, story that pointed to the clear conclusion that he had raped Maria Butina. But he hadn't done that.

  • Byrne is very smart. You can ascertain this for yourself by carefully examining his writings in conjunction with known facts about his life.

 

Now go to the "official" first part of the five-part series:

https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/01/november-3-december-23-all-the-presidents-teams/

See the opening in the graphic. Read closely. What is wrong?

Think it out before reading further. See "answer" at link below…

 

The paragraph is bullshit.

Moreover, the chance that Patrick Byrne does not know it is bullshit is pretty much zero. (Read some of his other essays.)

Moreover, this is not just any random paragraph, but the overt opening paragraph of the whole series. And insofar as it purports to explain why Byrne will say little about Powell, and much about Rudy, the paragraph is overtly a commentary on the entire series.

And what the paragraph is implicitly saying is that the entire series is mixed with bullshit.

 

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/attorney-client-privilege.html

Anonymous ID: 3c5747 Feb. 8, 2021, 10:22 p.m. No.12866508   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6514 >>6576 >>6756 >>6885 >>6939

>>12866502

(continued)

 

Now check given paragraph from Chapter 1:

https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/01/november-3-december-23-all-the-presidents-teams/

 

First, what is the typical NPC reader going to think?

Maybe: Haha, that lech! Just like Borat!

 

The fake news widely reported a scene in the recent Borat film where Rudy supposedly "got caught" getting ready to get physical with a teenage girl.

(Never mind that this was seemingly not true at all…)

 

An even more astute NPC might take it further: Byrne, you hypocrite! You have affairs with much younger women yourself!

That, at least, is true, as indeed Byrne describes in multiple essays.

 

At this point a thinking reader might pause and think…

How does Byrne know that Rudy's "senior assistant" is 21 years old? (Maybe she's doing her fall semester internship with the "stop the steal" team?)

Is it at all believable that Byrne's first thought on seeing this supermodel babe was that it "wasn't a good look" for Rudy? Or is that the sort of thing a virtue signaller might say, to distract attention from his true thoughts?

But does Byrne give any sign of being a virtue signaller? Or do his other essays suggest a certain matter-of-factness when it comes to enjoyment of affairs with women of whatever age?

 

Byrne spends much time blasting Rudy as an over-the-hill boozer who couldn't get it together…

But did you actually WATCH any of the Rudy-and-Jenna show? I found it rather engaging…

Anonymous ID: 3c5747 Feb. 8, 2021, 10:23 p.m. No.12866514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6520 >>6576 >>6756 >>6885 >>6939

>>12866508

(continued)

Wait.. Jenna?

Strangely, Byrne never mentions her at all.

Tons about Rudy. And he at least "explains" right at the start why he says little about Sidney.

But Jenna goes unnoticed. Strange, because some have opined that is a good-looking woman. She might agree:

https://www.dallasobserver.com/arts/trump-lawyer-jenna-ellis-says-conservative-women-are-definitely-hotter-11981774

Was she just out of the office every time Byrne was there?

 

Or maybe he does mention her repeatedly…

What is clear is that Byrne refuses to precisely identify one member of Team Rudy, instead repeatedly calling him/her "Mediocrity". (He plays up the fact that he will not reveal the gender.)

 

And in fact, on Byrne's own site and elsewhere, many have speculated that "Mediocrity" is Jenna Ellis.

There are plausible arguments pro and con.

But perhaps there is no real fact-of-the-matter.

Perhaps the very point is to foster a lurid buzz about the idea that "she" might be Jenna Ellis.

 

Put yourself in the mind of a goodthinking striver. Jenna Ellis has low-status degrees (Colorado State, Richmond). Patrick Byrne has high-status degrees (Dartmouth, Cambridge, Stanford). To the status-obssessed, that makes her a mediocrity right there! And they can sort of empathize with "Byrne" on this even if he did fall in with the Trumpsters…

 

But she's also, well, kind of a hottie. No wonder Byrne is fantasizing about him/her inviting "someone" over to discuss strategy and opening the door in her underwear.

 

If only she weren't such a damn Christian! I am Patrick Byrne, PhD, entrepreneur, cloak-and-dagger cultured man-of-the-world and she keeps quoting the Bible and caring about rules that apply to little people! Jenna, you have no idea what you're missing!

 

Or maybe Dr. Byrne is somewhat wiser, and knows he is guiding the pseudo-sophisticated along a treacherous path…

Anonymous ID: 3c5747 Feb. 8, 2021, 10:25 p.m. No.12866520   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6576 >>6756 >>6885 >>6939

>>12866514

(continued)

Byrne opens Chapter 4 by telling about Mike Flynn:

https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/02/how-djt-lost-the-white-house-chapter-4-the-christmas-doldrums-december-23-noon-january-6/

 

Not being mediocrities, I suppose many of you already knew that stuff.

I mean the part about how Flynn's great success in Iraq was in drastically improving the ability to quickly exploit acquired intelligence.

Byrne kind of drops that in without really exploiting it. He says somewhere that he was just writing drafts to get the info out. Maybe he will take that out in rewrite.

Byrne seems to like Flynn, but honestly this just makes Flynn look like a dumbfuck. He is an "expert" on quickly exploiting acquired intelligence, but the whole point of Byrne's essay is that the team acquired tons of info but failed to exploit it in a timely manner.

 

And now Beijing Biden is president, but at least Byrne can fantasize about Jenna inviting him over for egg rolls.