Anons, just wanted to make a quick note of something that I heard on a newscast. Predicatably, the media is going wild over, and trying to distort, Rudy Giuliani's statement that Cohen paid Stormy Daniels out of POTUS' personal finances. As Giuliani explained, and as anybody with common sense would attest, $130,000 for a legal expense is hardly a big deal to a multibillionaire. If Trump was worth $2,000,000,000 when he took office, it would be as if you had $200,000 in the bank and a trusted employee spent $13 of it.

Looking back on Avenatti's history, you definitely get the sense that he's /theirguy. But he does have background on laws re: the FISA court. I've had a sneaking suspicion that this whole Stormy Daniels nonsense was part of the plan to discredit the media–coked-up interview, finger-pointing at her ex-husband, endless pee papers, barely any credit given to POTUS for ending a war without a bullet shot…I think it's happening like this because Americans have to be reprogrammed before they can accept the truth.

One of the things that Avenatti said, in response to what Giuliani said, was that it wouldn't matter if the money was taken from POTUS' personal finances because the law doesn't work that way. So here's the thing about what Avenatti said: if a commingling of funds is against the law, then why is it okay to give Planned Parenthood $500 million and tell them that it can't be used for abortions? Clearly it frees up their other funds for doing so. What about all of the other money given out to NGOs, earmarked with similar restrictions? The Soros Leaks are rife with all kinds of instances where they speak of changing wording to make it seem like money is coming from one fund and not the other. Will this lawyer be bringing all of them down as well?

Maybe it's difference with campaign finance law, but if it is, then how could the revelation be used to nail HRC?

As I stated before, I think the raid on Cohen was to prep the public for what's going to happen to the cabal's lawyers. I think this is more of the same: the media will cheer when Avenatti challenges on the grounds that he commingled funds, and maybe he'll win. The media will absolutely go apeshit over it. Then the US Government will look at Hillary Clinton's campaign finances…

After all…what damage will it really do, if Stormy comes out later on and says that she's been working with POTUS the whole time?