MAYBE WE ARE ASKING THE WRONG QUESTIONS…MAYBE WE SHOULD STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THIS DIFFERENTLY-MAYBE IT’S THE BEST OF TWO BAD CHOICES?

A YOUNG, 3-YR CHILD, IS RUNNING FREE OUTSIDE ON A BEAUTIFUL SUMMER DAY.THEY STEP ON AN OLD RUSTY NAIL AND PUNTURE THEIR FOOT. THE PARENT CARRIES THE CHILD INTO THE E-ROOM, WHERE A CREW OF PEOPLE STRAP THE CHILD DOWN AND GIVE THEM A TETNUS SHOT.

TO THE CHILD-THIS IS VERY TRAUMATIC-THEY KNOW IT IS HURTING THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE HEALING THEM ARE HURTING THEM.

BEING UNABLE TO COMMUNICATE TO THE CHILD, “WHY” WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THE BEST OF TWO PAINFUL, POSSIBLE DEATHLY CHOICES.

THE PARENT MUST CHOOSE BETWEEN HOPING THE CHILD DOES NOT GET TETNUS FROM THE CUT-OR MUST WATCH THE CHILD GO THROUGH A SITUATION THEY CAN NOT FATHOM.

THINK OF HOW THAT PARENT FEELS…KNOWING THE CHILD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, IS INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING.

MY AWARENESS IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS IS THAT THE CHEMTRAILING HAS BACKED WAY OFF, HERE IN THE MID-WEST…. MAYBE ONLY ONE DAY OUT OF FOUR…BUT I ALSO SEE MORE PLANE CRASHES AND ELECTRONIC INTERFERENCES ON MANY VARIOUS LEVELS.

MAYBE WE SHOULD BE ASKING Q “WHY” ARE THEY SPRAYING INSTEAD OF INSISTING IT STOPS. MAYBE THE SPRAYING HAS BEEN REDUCED, BUT WITH CONSEQUENCES. WE DO NOT KNOW “WHY” THEY ARE SPRAYING, WE ONLY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SPRAYING.

“WHY” IS A VERY VALUABLE QUESTION. ARE WE MATURE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND, IF WE ARE TOLD, THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS THE BEST OF TWO EVILS?