Anonymous ID: 3bd7a8 Feb. 9, 2021, 3:32 p.m. No.12873933   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3945 >>3971

Do you remember, about a million years ago, when we used to talk about anime? It seemed almost as if our ability to process media from foreign cultures enhanced our ability to analyze serious media texts from our own culture. Those were good days.

 

Anyway, I wonder whether Trump is planning to allow himself to be illegally convicted of inciting violence precisely so that he can enter a huge amount of evidence into the public record. Here's a scenario: Trump gets a damning legal attack today, and he starts unsealing indictments and declassified evidence about the last twelve years of corruption until March. Then, on March 4th…

Anonymous ID: 3bd7a8 Feb. 9, 2021, 3:40 p.m. No.12874010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-some-self-awareness-white.html

 

Go ahead and give it a read. You might disagree, but I think you will find it engaging. The blogger wrote:

 

 

>Americans, especially White Americans, the descendants of the founding stock of the nation, no longer have a country because they are so lacking in self-awareness. Both elitism and populism among white Americans have failed.

 

>White 'liberals' tend to be elitist, and this has meant most of them coming under the influence of Jewish-dominated academia, media, and think-tanks. …So, white 'liberals' become mindless parrots of Jewish/Globalist Power.

>This affects even the elites of the Christian Church. ….White 'liberals' dominate white elite circles because they are more inclined toward intellectual, cultural, and/or statist pursuits, but as they follow the lead of Jewish Power, they never conceive of an agenda or policy that is good for whites. They submit to a set of 'values' that are said to be about 'justice' and 'equity', but it really means whites lose out to facilitate Jews getting richer, blacks grabbing privilege, homos receiving adulation, and masses of non-white immigrants replacing whites as the peons of the Holy Three of Jews, blacks, and homos. (Women don't gain much either. Even though Jews used feminism to pit white women against white men, Jews don't like women-power because women also represent a 'majority'. There are many many of them. Jews prefer elite-minority supremacist power, and that is why Jewish Power insists that women take a backseat to trannies. So, if a fat ugly guy with voluminous pair of balls and a fat penis insists he's a 'woman', women better agree OR ELSE be condemned for 'hatred' and 'non-inclusion of trannies into womanhood'. White 'liberal' women are among the most PC and conformist-minded. Lacking balls, they are even more likely to cave to the prevailing authority. So, their idea of 'resistance' is never independently formulated and instead whatever the Power defines for them. It never occurs to them that true resistance against The Power would necessitate speaking Truth to Jewish Power. Because lesbians have metaphorical balls, they are ironically more likely to push against the notion of fat-ugly-men-with-big-balls pretending to be 'women'. Tranny vs Terf war is between having-male-balls-to-declare-oneself-female and having-proverbial-balls-to-safeguard-bitchdom. At any rate, Jews prefer the minority-'womanhood' of trannies to the majority-womanhood of real women. Tranny supremacism better complements their status as the minority elite rulers over the West and its empire.)

 

>White 'conservatives' tend to be populist, and this has meant most of them coming under the influence of demagogues, yahoos, charlatans, and ignoramuses. While populists feel more real as red-white-and-blue Americans who steer clear of elitist and globalist prattle, the sad truth is that most leaders and spokesmen of populism are unscrupulous, opportunistic, compromised, and/or demented(like Ted Nugent). Take Rush Limbaugh. His neo-Archie-Bunkerism was amusing at times but fed on the smugness of the masses. Limbaugh pushed globalism(especially 'free trade') along with vestiges of real conservatism. He denounced Pat Buchanan in 2000 as a 'populist, not a conservative', but his own style from the beginning was pure populism. If anything, Buchanan was more the conservative as he began to question GOP policies that were doing harm to American Sovereignty. Limbaugh was essentially the shill for the GOP and Bush II's policy of more war and more unregulated trade. Just about the only thing he disagreed with Bush on was amnesty.

>Because populists go with emotions than with ideas and intellect, they can easily be swayed like the spellbound crowd by Mark Anthony after Julius Caesar's death. Oftentimes, populists don't even realize they've been led astray or betrayed in some fundamental way. As they're more fixated on personalities or symbols, their enthusiasm can be led from Point A to Point B. Notice how the many 'dittoheads' made peace with 'gay marriage' because Rush Limbaugh, under pressure from globalist sponsors who pay for advertising, gave up on resisting the homo agenda. So-called 'conservatives' have given up on the 'gay' issue and are now pretending to stand firm against trannies. But with Lady Maga being promoted at Trump rallies, how long can that last?

 

It goes on for a while. 9/10,as rants go.