My issue with that perspective, is what others have done would have nothing to do with attorney-client privilege because they were in positions where not reporting on the things OTHERS were doing is a violation of federal law. If you receive classified information or know that someone is breaking the law in a government position then YOU are just as liable as the criminal if you don't report it. Subpoenaed materials are actually under the law as well—you can't just have someone biased toward you go through them. The investigators are the ones required to go through it, a government official is required to give it ALL. Particularly if they're already in a position where they have completely and utterly broken the fucking law and mixed their business and personal lives in a server that is already illegal. That is just how it works—their attorneys don't have a right to the information until the discovery part of the trial at that point.
Yes, I've considered that. To me, the ends do not justify the means. Dissolving it would be unnecessary in the actual cases that we're looking into. I do think that Cohen was in on the raid and knew what was going on when the fire happened. There's really no question about it, but there is a question as to whether he's willingly turning against his integrity to ensure the arrest of his former clients or not. Because, honestly, I cannot see any of them deciding to turn over ACTUAL evidence against themselves to an attorney at such a high level unless they were genuinely deceived into believing he was on their side.