Anonymous ID: d95c88 May 3, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.1287809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7993

>>1287089 last

 

Are the sealed indictments brought by "military authorities?"

 

Military tribunals in the United States are military courts designed to try members of enemy forces during wartime, operating outside the scope of conventional criminal and civil proceedings. The judges are military officers and fulfill the role of jurors. Military tribunals are distinct from courts-martial.

 

A military tribunal is an inquisitorial system based on charges brought by military authorities, prosecuted by a military authority, judged by military officers, and sentenced by military officers against a member of an enemy army.

 

The United States has made use of military tribunals or commissions, rather than rely on a court-martial, within the military justice system, during times of declared war or rebellion.

 

Most recently, as discussed below, the administration of George W. Bush sought to use military tribunals to try "unlawful enemy combatants", mostly individuals captured abroad and held at a prison camp at a military base at Guantรกnamo Bay, Cuba.

Anonymous ID: d95c88 May 3, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.1287911   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1287742

I think Avenatti will be the one getting screwed here, not Cohen. Stormy may get off more lightly, but they have no case. You cant sue the President when you have no case. It's a civil version of Mueller. They all need to get whacked.

Anonymous ID: d95c88 May 3, 2018, 12:43 p.m. No.1288169   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1287993

If they are charged with conspiring in treason or sedition with any foreign person or entity against the US govt or the People, they can be charged as "enemy combatants" and be subjected to a Mil Trib. That's the threshold issue.