Repost from previous
This is great anon, thx a lot. Yes, like you I thought at the time that she'd learned something, or there was another development that we weren't aware of. Re-reading Q's post intrigued me re the Podesta Group. Thinking that here must be something in Pacer.
And thank you baker.
I thought the very same until seeing the linked article from April 18 which reports that just before he stepped down, the company didn't have enough funds to cover the staff's sallaries. From this, it appears that it was going under, so it may be that the Kimberley Fritts rebrand story was simply PR spin to keep the breaking news sweet. That the company was folding was definitely not mentioned back in October. See what you think. The article -
How Tony Podesta, a Washington Power Broker, Lost It All
WP subscription, so https://archive.is/dynoS
Any RockstarAnon have a Pacer account?
Like to lend a hand for the cause?
Regards QPost >>1215294
<Why did the Podesta Group close shop?
<https://www.pacer.gov
>Pepe love for anyfag who can (and for all Qfags actually)
Regards their financial gaps, who would have filled those when Kim was taking over? Did she have the collateral to do so? She must have known about the gaps and issues, so why take a company over in that position when she could have simply started a new one up from the outset? I completely agree with you that there's more, but still believe the Kim take over was a PR spin to keep the financial woes out of the press. Could be all of the above, including your theories anon, idk.
Looking for an anon with a Pacer acct!
20 million isn't bad at all. How is it that they couldn't pay the staff though with 20 million? It doesn't make sense.
>give us tony, or shut it down.
They already had Tony, no? Are you saying that whoever it was who said to 'shut it down' just didn't want a company named 'Podesta' around, even if Tony was out? It's god to hear your thoughts anon.
-Good, even.
Makes sense.