>>1286970

NOT BUYING IT. IF IT'S THIS "INNOCENT" WHY THE 3 SECOND EDIT (GAP) IN SECOND CAMERA WHICH OBVIOUSLY SHOWS THE OBJECT FROM A DIFFERENT TRAJECTORY.?==

>>1287427

Meaning? More info for non-techie please!

>>1287158

HERE'S SOME SCREEN SAVES RE: "BIRD" IN FIRST CAMERA SHOT:

1. Notice "bird" approaching the telephone pole…wings fully spread.

2. Notice "bird" SUDDENLY DISAPPEARS as IF BEHIND the POLE.

3. Notice "bird" SUDDENLY APPEARS as "IF COMING FROM BEHIND the Pole at a LOWER PLACE.'''

4. Notice "bird" lands at a GREAT DISTANCE FROM THE POLE in the middle of the parking lot! In essence, wasn't even NEAR THE POLE!

SO, LOGICAL ANONS, HOW CAN A BIRD COMPLETELY DISAPPEAR IN MID-FLIGHT OVER A PARKING LOT (WITH NOTHING TO HIDE BEHIND), AND THEN REAPPEAR?

Bottom Line: The video makes it LOOK like it's disappearing behind the pole (perfectly lined up too) and we know it wasn't ANYWHERE NEAR THE POLE!

I don't know WHO ANONS ARE (obviously) and the individual who posted this video may/may not be US! Makes perfect sense that whoever EDITED THE SECOND CAMERA (in the full length video) could have done some editing HERE AS WELL.

>>1287051

>>1286638

>>1286487

>>1286321

>>1287789

HERE'S THE LINK:

VIDEO LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldwWfQb4Odo

PEOPLE DON'T WASTE TIME EDITING A VIDEO AT THE EXACT SPOT THAT IS IN QUESTION UNLESS THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE. PERIOD.

>>1287811

I saved the ACTUAL VIDEO (full length) last night….tried to upload it DIRECTLY TODAY…and wouldn't work!

Obviously, as I point it out over and over again, they'll fix the mistakes AGAIN in the first camera shot…and edit it some more!

Not a techie just SMELL FISHY WHEN SOMETHING IS EDITED (TIME STAMP SHOWS IT CLEARLY) AT THE EXACT SAME 3 SECONDS BEING QUESTIONED IN THE FIRST CAMERA SHOT.

>>1287828

THANK YOU ANON!

Can clearly see the "bird dive" (wayyyy to fast) a few seconds before the BLAST and the TIME-STAMP showing the 3 SEC MISSING GAP - EDIT - from the second camera further along in the video!!