yes, but death was a definite possibility. over a great deal of time, from a great deal of places. no.the police force in new zealand is on overall good terms with the public and, unlike in other european nations such as france, the uk, or norway they have so far remained loyal to the people.so harming the nz police officers was to be avoided at all costs unless the state enforcer was from an invaders background. why is that their non diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics? blitz to dominant positions all true movements are populist movements while the movement itself, at least in the vanguard stage, does not need to have the support of the entire population, eventually we will need our people to join our new society, and voluntarily. the europe of the future is not one of concrete and steel, smog and wires but a place of forests, lakes, mountains and meadows.

each year these degenerates are responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, in our own cities and across the globe. did you intend to survive the attack? they may be able to discredit one small movement, from one nation. venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. which i do not mind. to add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of western thought.

>why not me?