the result is obvious. who do you support? art and beauty subverted beyond all recognition, bauhaus travesties replacing nouveau wonders, soulless metropolitan architecture of glass and steel reflecting no society, no culture, no people and therefore belonging everywhere, and no where. ngos are traitor organizations if you lose history will write you as monsters, regardless of your tactics.win first, write the narrative later. a ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. what do you want? your grand children? because the “ x ” groups can be dealt with in time, but the high fertility immigrants will destroy us now, soon it is a matter of survival we destroy them first. let our lives be stronger than death to fight against the enemies of the christian people. ” ask yourself, what would pope urban ii do? what nations do we have to conserve? the idea that all it takes for a han chinese man to become german is to be born on german soil is as insane as a german born on mars becoming a martian.

our lands are not their home, they can return to their own lands or found their homelands elsewhere. i mostly agree with sir oswald mosley ’ s views and consider myself an eco-fascist by nature. voting is mob rule and mob rule is media rule and media rule is corporate rule ngos are directly involved in the genocide of the european people beholden to no one and hiding their true intent behold a faux-religious facade, these ngo groups ferry the invaders to european shores aboard their own vessels, directly shipping this vast army straight into european nations to plunder, rape and ethnically displace the native european people. to ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique, undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. children of invaders do not stay children, they become adults and reproduce, creating more invaders to replace your people.they grow up and vote against your peoples own wishes, for the interests of their own people and identity. no, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity.

>and how does diversity increase that strength?