Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 7:37 a.m. No.12880645   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0671 >>0674 >>0736

>>12880531

 

Actually,

he built it on the other side of that mountain,

to face the rising sun in the morning.

It did not overlook Jerusalem.

However,

he was still a cuck for marrying an alien woman who worshiped Moloch,

and he himself went into that chapel and offered sacrifices.

He also married other foreign wives,

and built at least one other idolatrous chapel.

He set the stage for idolatry in Israel by making it allowed.

The captain determines the direction of the ship.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 7:53 a.m. No.12880757   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0768

>>12880592

 

>Remember that it is not a prayer which will keep the darkness at bay, but a sword.

 

For Christians,

the Sword is the Word of God,

which is the Doctrine of the Prophets and the Apostles (Scripture) that keeps the Darkness at bay.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:08 a.m. No.12880847   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0862 >>0902

>>12880801

 

I had said "for Christians" since you had addressed "darkness".

The physical sword is indeed appointed to all earthly governments.

The Sword of Christians in battling Darkness,

which is Satan,

is only the Word of God.

You are conflating the two.

Are Christians in earthly governments?

Yes,

and when they are,

they use the physical sword against physical enemies on behalf of their earthly government.

For Darkness however,

they use the Sword that is the Word of God.

 

As to the citation you used,

the rule of interpreting less clear verses so they don't contradict more clear ones,

is to abide by the clear ones.

It is clear in Ephesians,

Paul provided the interpretation of a "sword".

The use of the word "sword" by Christ was not to be understood as a physical sword,

no more than when He used the term "leaven" to mean physical leaven,

which He said was the teaching of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.

Therefore,

going by the clear interpretation relative to the term "sword",

Christ was speaking about the Word of God.

The "cloaks" to which He referred would have been their unique outer garments of the colors of their families.

He was telling them they had to leave that loyalty to their families and traditions to exchange those for the Word of God.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:17 a.m. No.12880902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0908 >>0998

>>12880850

 

The physical sword was indeed used by men of God under the old dispensation when ridding their earthly nation (which had the Commandments of Moses as their Laws)

of idolaters.

Under the new dispensation,

Christian souls are not of this earth,

but of the Heavenly Jerusalem,

though they are physically of earthly nations (see my previous comments:

>>12880847

 

Christians fight against Darkness with the Word of God,

but they can also wield a physical sword to fight against physical evil on earth.

Those however are two entirely different levels of warfare.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:37 a.m. No.12881040   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12880622

>All i can tell you for now, is that Sol is not the Orignal star of Earth, Saturn was.

>

>Satun was drawn close to the Sol galaxy and earth was pulled from the saturnarian orbit.

 

This is the only thing that is plausible of your post.

The Sumerians "sars" were measurements relative to Saturn,

and not to years of earth.

That is why the first of their kings' ages were such high numbers.

They can be recalculated,

and their average ages are equal to the averages ages of the Old Testament elders' ages in their lineage in Genesis.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:45 a.m. No.12881103   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1109 >>1133

>>12880998

 

Elijah and Moses were in the vision at the transfiguration,

because Moses represented the Law and Elijah,

the Prophets.

This was showing Christ came to fulfill both the Law and the Prophets (what they foretold about Him).

However,

the Two Witnesses of which the Revelation speaks are also called "lampstands",

the interpretation of which was provided in the very same book in the preamble of letters to the congregations in Asia.

The interpretation of "lampstands" is "congregations".

The Two Witnesses are two congregations:

the Elect from among the Jews,

and the Elect from among the Gentiles,

just as Christ said,

He had another flock to bring into His one Fold.

The first flock were those to whom He was then preaching,

and the other flock were the nations to whom He sent His disciples to preach the Gospel.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:47 a.m. No.12881137   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1164

>>12881109

 

It was a vision,

and ordained,

not "last minute planning".

And yes,

Moses and Elijah will indeed resurrect along with the rest of the Body of Christ when Christ returns bodily.

Anonymous ID: 083de2 Feb. 10, 2021, 8:53 a.m. No.12881228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1238

>>12881133

 

Again,

the Revelation was a vision.

In vision,

the objects are allegories.

To interpret the allegories,

one needs to search throughout the rest of Scripture.

"Sackcloth" represents "mourning",

as is done during tribulation.

The "street" represents the "broad road" to destruction.

The Witnesses,

the Body of Christ,

were preaching to the lost on that "street",

and for their Testimony,

many were slain in the war waged against them by the False Prophet and his Harlot.

The first of those testifying against the False Prophet were non-Catholic Christians.

They were slaughtered by the armies controlled by the False Prophet.

Thinking he had succeeded in slaying the Two Witnesses,

there arose in their place the Reformers who preached against the corruption in their own church,

seeking to reform the Romish church.

It is in this way that the Two Witnesses "arose from the dead",

by virtue of their testifying the same thing the first group had.