Question. say this is true… what's the point? I dont understand. So I can see it serving some statistical value to estimate the value of each living citizen in a nation. If you have 10 citizens your nation is worth 5mill, and if you can up the life expectancy then those 10 citizens will be productive longer. If so, then wouldn't it be in the governments best interest to protect their investments by giving good health care and keep them happy workers for as long as possible?
Yeah, has anyone EVER done that?
To me, it seems like a reasonable way to measure the worth of a nation from a bankers point of view. If a nation is going to default on a debt, a banker can consider the possibility of future growth based on the citizenry and decide to loan them more money. If they thought the citizenry was fucked and half were about to die from disease, then they won't loan them money. If anything I think this promotes good behavior.
I don't think 500,000E is literally put in a vault per person born that someone can literally claim. Except perhaps in the sense that they're allowed to expand their money supply by that factor with every new birth.
But then what happens with death? Do they need to shrink the balance?
>>1288806
"If you see me running, try to keep up!"
Q