venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. yes, by definition, as i believe racial differences exist between peoples and they have a great impact on the way we shape our societies i also believe fertility rates are part of those racial differences and that the immigrants in our lands with high fertility must be forced out to ensure the existance of our race. in the event of an engagement i had the somewhat quixotic notion of shouting down responding state enforcers, intimidating them into dropping their weapons and if that failed, only targeting non-vital areas of their body such as the anterior of the thigh, shoulder or a side-on through shot of the calf, hamstring or gluteal muscles so as to cause the least amount of harm as possible and to allow for a quick recovery. why focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue? destabilize, then take control. i remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in eastern france, of roughly 15-25 thousand people.

this is ethnic replacement. in the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us. who do you follow? no two different things can ever truly be equal, especially humans. so yes. our lands are not their home, they can return to their own lands or found their homelands elsewhere.

>why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue?