>>12890809

I looked into this for someone who had a loved one, in a care facility, forced to take the vax. Within a few days, started experiencing major pain, spiked a fever, and passed away. Scary shit below. "IMMUNITY" is for BIG PHARMA, not the little people.

If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law.

The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.

“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“

You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.

Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “covered countermeasure,” such as a vaccine. But it is difficult to use and rarely pays. Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6% of the claims filed in the last decade.

Immune to lawsuits

In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the company. The protection lasts until 2024.

That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid.

HHS declined CNBC’s request for an interview.

Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline.

“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn.

More

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html

>Does anyone read??

>>12891058

I was answering the question about liability that I have found, for the other anon. How does your snide comment help anyone?

How about instead of being a condescending a-hole, you understand that some here, may have not seen your post. I know, shocking right. Because you're you after all, and everyone should have seen it right! Gasp! Shock! Ego take a hit? Awwww. Eyeroll.

>>12891143

>>12891147

SHILLS IDENTIFIED. ^^^

Ahh, the Spawn of Satan has spoke.

Hillary Clinton Says Donald Trump Will Only Be Acquitted For 1 Reason

Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that the only reason former President Donald Trump might be acquitted in his impeachment trial for inciting the Capitol insurrection is because his co-conspirators are members of the Senate jury.

“If Senate Republicans fail to convict Donald Trump, it won’t be because the facts were with him or his lawyers mounted a competent defense,” tweeted Clinton, Trump’s Democratic rival in the 2016 election.

“It will be because the jury includes his co-conspirators,” she wrote.

Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) are among Senate Republicans who helped Trump stoke anger in the weeks leading up to the riot. They promoted the ex-president’s lie that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

Clinton’s post came on the second day of Trump’s trial, during which Democrats shared previously unseen security footage of police directing Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) away from the violent mob, and rioters smashing windows and searching for Vice President Mike Pence.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-impeachment-capitol-riot-080409012.html

CA and STEALTH? Comms? Or just CONdoms?

California may make it illegal to remove a condom without consent

A new bill could make California the first state in the US to make stealthing - removing a condom without a person's consent - illegal.

If passed, AB 453 would categorize stealthing as a form of sexual battery and allow survivors to sue for emotional and physical damages.

The bill would amend the state definition of sexual battery to include a person "who causes contact between a penis, from which a condom has been removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the condom being removed."

Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens) told the Los Angeles Times that, while stealthing has been an existing problem, it has gone unrecognized legally because of its covert nature.

"It's been going on for awhile. There's blogs online that are helping individuals, teaching them how to get away with this," Garcia told the Los Angeles Times. "We need to be able to call it what it is in order to be able to deter behavior."

Stealthinghas been a problem for years, but is only just being discussed in the mainstream

Stealthing has gotten more attention in recent years because of its increased visibility on popular shows like "I May Destroy You." Written by Michaela Coel, the show was lauded for addressing less recognized instances of sexual assault like stealthing as what they are: assault.

However, stealthing has existed for years with little recognition as a growing problem.

A 2017 report published in the Columbia Journal of Gender and Law found stealthing is a trend in sexual assault that is on the rise, as more people report it has happened to them. A 2018 study by researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre found one in three women and one in five men who have sex with men report being stealthed during sex.

"Survivors [of stealthing] describe non-consensual condom removal as a threat to their bodily agency and as a dignitary harm," Columbia report author Alexandra Brodsky told the Independent in 2017. "'You have no right to make your own sexual decisions,' they are told. 'You are not worthy of my consideration.'"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-may-illegal-remove-condom-182959906.html