Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 4:33 a.m. No.12890804   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12890795

even when you can tell by the ID that it's a Q post because Q posted in the same bread wiht a trip code using the same ID, even when . . .

Q instructed that it not be reported in notables or as a Q drop!

Q told us.

stop this slide.

long timers know this.

and you assumping that you can slide this shows you are not a long timer here.

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 4:36 a.m. No.12890820   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0840

>>12890807

again, it's OK to believe what I want.

If I am wrong I am wrong however!

if I KNOW it was a Q post, without the trip code IT IS NOT TO BE told about in notable or in Q drop lists.

so for something that has nothing to make it a Q drop except for someone wanting to believe that: you are not to report it as per Q's very instructions.

you can slide it all day.

it's the instructions we were given.

 

deal with it.

you're sliding the board with this.

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 4:40 a.m. No.12890845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0855

>>12890840

it's well known.

everyone who is a long term lurker knows.

you can argue but you are still wrong.

you are trying to start a conflict.

I am informing you of the facts of the situation.

so you do that, what you said.

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 4:43 a.m. No.12890860   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0871

>>12890849

>>12890852

you keep badgering and sliding.

the anon is correct in what he say: no trip code, not a Q drop.

even if it has the same ID as another drop that is a Q drop.

>>12890855

the sauce are all the other anon who can verify what I say. But you ignore them.

why should I go searching through my archives at your request when it's clear to all lurkers that you are wrong, a newbie, and being a badger shill?

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 5:14 a.m. No.12891038   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12890985

there are very many books about Rome's tunnels and underground.

fascinating stuff.

there are some Mithraeums in Rome, in tunnels, those are known.

It's a hobby of mine: arm chair archiology.

the stuff you discover.

Look for videos of rome. One guy he's a spanish guy, so it's all in Spanish, he'll lower his camera down into a tnnel. He has a great video at Castle San Angelo, and others at the Forum and the Vatican.

He shows you some of what you ask about but in other parts.

 

I recently learned that through the Roman Forum there is a channel that was cut through to drain the area due to constant flooding. It was built with Tufa blocks 3 meters on a side! (quite a deal).

 

There is very much in Rome in full view that doesn't get a lot of write up in History or travel books.

use walk through videos. Learn how to translate Latin or Italian. Read the gravestones, monuments, and signs.

I was able to discover about a well known (in Rome) Roman family that way by reading a name that doesn't show up that much in the books I have.

but wow it's got a long and rich history!

 

so as far as what is underneath the Vatican?

it was built on a circus, was it not?

you can study it's archiology and even see 'time lapse' now and then kinds of videos.

or get a book with an overlay that will show the old circus, then the St Peters (as it was at first)

and then Michalangelos and Bernini's work too.

 

If you really want to know there are many books.

"Subterranian Rome" is one title

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 5:28 a.m. No.12891104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1107 >>1121

>>12890985

>(You)

here is an article from just a few days ago about the Necropolis excavations under the Vatican:

https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/archaeologists-discover-friends-of-caesars-inside-vatican-city-657802

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 5:44 a.m. No.12891172   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12891130

technically it's the people's house, so if they own it, and didn't vandalize anything, how can it be tresspassing?

they were swept along by the enthusiasum of getting to see the building and . . . were mostly acting like tourists.

notice all the chinese spy looking photographers.

or the person tieing his shoe. Or the person who moves the fire extinquisher out of the way.

these are frames of a video.

CSPAN should have it so . . . if it does you can hear some voices.

by the way some of them were not Maga based upon what they said, like this woman who shout 'We own you now , Bitches!'

she didn't seem MAGA to me.

 

but ya, all day it was a 'celebration' kind of atmosphere.

the 'riot' narrative didn't show up till the next day by my recollection.

guy on skateboard is seen in the end part of this video (the camera was then outside and the feed must have been different)>

then later in the day at dusk I saw the person again, rollingthrough another scene on the MSM.

so if it was a riot why were all of these people doing a celebration (like a rock show parking lot) outside the building?

 

becuase the riot narrative is FAKE & GAY

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 6:02 a.m. No.12891273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1284

FYI:

i needed a new gas cap.

I wanted to pass my inspection, the light stayed on.

the cap with the connector was like 30 bucks.

I'm like 'no'.

so I found an old rubber glove. I folded it over a bunch of times. I cut a hole in it. I rolled it down to where the old hardened gasket was. I had reset the lights, fully charged the battery . . .

that glove, which I would have just thrown away, fixed the gasket problem for the tank-cap and the check-engine lights have stayed off ever sense.

 

so recylce those hard-gasket gascaps with a disposalble rubber glove.

Anonymous ID: 52e4c7 Feb. 11, 2021, 6:27 a.m. No.12891427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1464

>>12891410

what about everyone else?

why aren't they doing something.

Oh, ya, they are.

it's all far more legitimate if the process is let to work

it won't be till after the Supreme Court hears Donald Trumps law suits that this thing wold escalate, if it were to.

so youdo you part.

Donald Trump is just one person.

It's 'We the People' so start doing something other than badgering about DJT, who is taking a deserved vacation between important gigs.

 

optics matter.

we will have our fair voting and better future!

no, we are not 'there yet'