SCOTUS WILL BE >FORCED< TO DECIDE ON FEBRUARY 19TH! HAPPENING!!!!!!!
SCOTUS WILL BE FORCED TO LOOK AT AND REVIEW ELECTION FRAUD EVIDENCE ON FEBRUARY 19TH. IT'S LITERALLY OVER FOR BIDEN!
>Donald Trump v Pennsylvania SoS
>Lin Wood v Georgia SoS
>Sidney Powell v Michigan SoS
>https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html
>DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
No matter how they decide, it can be called a "happening":
>They are convinced by the affidavits, statistical evidence, and the last minute unconstitutional election law changes enough to set an OPEN TRIAL. That would be major.
>They look at all of the evidence and decide that THIS CASE ISN'T WORTHY OF AN OPEN TRIAL. Just imagine the reactions. Even from democrat intellectuals. Even democrats would not like it.
Either way, after February 19th the supreme court of the United States will NOT be able to claim ignorance to election fraud. If they do, every single NATO member should just quit NATO, because being in a military alliance with a banana republic is not a smart geopolitical decision, to say the least.
So what do these cases mean?
When the transparency of the vote counting process had been blocked in a certain voting district, the results of that district ought to be audited. Audit =/= recount. They will actually check each vote (reminder that they only need to check the votes cast in districts where poll watchers/vote counters have sworn statements that they had seen illegal practices) and see if the person behind those votes is real or not. This is where many of the fake votes will fail the test. This only needs to successfully happen in a single state, and SCOTUS February 19th ruling could force Pennsylvania, Georgia or Michigan, or even all of them, to have a real audit.
The first domino has already fallen in NY 22nd congressional district. NY state court threw out all of the illegal votes and this changed the end result:
>http://www.courts.state.ny.us/REPORTER/3dseries/2021/2021_21018.htm