It`s glorious to watch.
Democrats must be having a very hard time sitting through this.
It will reach a tiny tiny amount. This is a marathon.
And I`m personally having lots of fun watching their lies be dissected right in front of their faces on national TV.
The message might be more believable if you did not resort to namecalling. Thank you for playing.
If you had any truth to offer, you would refer to specific bits of information presented and counter with what exactly you think is wrong with the information by countering with your own information.
Instead you resort to a blanket response "dumb, fool".
Icy hue.
Good luck.
Keep calling me names if it makes you happy.
Maybe that path has merit. Maybe it`s what god wants.
>what God Wants…
>God gets
I would agree with that.
>humans can not accept Him on His Terms.
Speak for yourself, hooman.
>as for names… [you] Do knœ Where (you) are, яiפнт¿
I have no problem with being called names, but don`t be expected to be taken seriously when it is the only "substance" in your reply.
"You are wrong and will go to hell" as a response to reading information that is in conflict with your belief system sounds like someone who has been seriously brainwashed.
If you were here to either educate, persuade, or shine a light on lies, what you would do is carefully lay out the lies you spot in my post and dissect them one by one so others can see the sheer expanse of my retardation.
Since you have made absolutely no effort to do that, it is very hard to seriously engage what you say. Not only because there is very little substance to actually engage.