>Where's the peachment at now ?
Super gay with a high likelihood of MOAR gay.
"Did Trump actually win the election?"
>Is there value to making the Dims lie about who won the election?
Yes because it shows they are knowingly participating in the coup d'etat.
>did Trump lose any court case? The Trump team were never allowed to show the evidence to a court.
correct. the only court(s) where the evidence was actually heard upheld Trump. I believe there has only been one in a state court.
Virtually all courts dismissed the cases without hearing or considering evidence.
>Ooh, Defense lawyers don’t want to answer!
The defense attorneys' judgement on whether or not Trump won the election is not at issue in this trial.
well, it depends…
"exculpitate"?
she dum
EXCULPATE, BITCH!
Perhaps we're about to see 53-47.
>I thought Trump fired the first lawyers because they were unwilling to present evidence of voter fraud ?!?
You saw that, but did you believe it?
This is warming people up (predictive linguistic programming) to the idea of THE BIG LIE.
The lie is a lot bigger than people think.
>Raskin now explains they could not handle a criminal case so brought a civil case. Loser!
Raskin explains how in criminal cases, they're fucked.
>Did the event help us get the Insurrection Act?
Interesting.
The Democrats are making their entire case predicated on the fact that Jan. 6th was an INSURRECTION.
Would it not, then, be 100% appropriate that Trump signed the insurrection act?
any senator voting to convict will end up being 100% unelectable.
This whole thing is forcing the normies to have to argue total complex conspiracy theories about Trump in order to defend their positions.
This will end up breaking down their ability to argue against complex conspiracies.
Minds open. Game over.
Their whole argument is based on the premise that Trump is so shrewed and tricky that he planned this attack for months and got everyone riled up with The Big Lie.
>When they convict what will be your cognative dissonance to justify how it was part of the plan?
I won't have cognitive dissonance. I'm not making assumptions. I made an assertion which is valid regardless of whether or not Trump is convicted.
Regardless of what happens, Trump has the support of the majority, contrary to the MSM's reporting. The way things are going, that majority is growing daily.
Do you do realize that "six-o-clock" also means "behind you"?
No kidding - I actually saw a guy at the grocery store with a mask he'd made out of a Crown Royal bag. Looked much better than the photo you posted. I complimented him on it and he laughed.